Fascism at the FED and the NY Federal District Court? I’m Shocked, Shocked . . .

55
Thu, May 22, 2014 - 12:17pm

Recently, Judge Ronnie Abrams (a female), issued a ruling dismissing the whistleblower case that former Goldman Sachs bank examiner Carmen M. Segarra filed against the venerable Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The case is found on Pacer, Case Number 1:13-cv-07173-RA, captioned Carmen M. Segarra vs. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, et al. Mr. TF asked me to weigh in on it, which I am most happy to oblige, because I am part of his cult . . .

Running a quick google search reveals the top story on it is, naturally, from the traditional media, here: https://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/23/nyfed-goldman-lawsuit-idUSL2N...

Basically, Ms. Segarra claimed she was fired for whistleblowing, that is, for reporting bad behavior by her employer, which in this case, happened to be the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. She wanted reinstatement, some money, and for her attorney’s fees to be paid by the defendants. She also asked for punitive damages. She filed suit in the den of thieves, the US Federal District Court for the Southern District of NY.

As an aside, why would anyone suing a bank, let alone part of the evil fiat scheme, the bank of last resort, The NY Fed, EVER in a million years think for one second that a sitting federal judge in the Southern District of NY, such judge appointed by the President, and confirmed by the Senate, who themselves are demonstrably and inexorably, hopelessly corrupted by bankers who own them, ever, ever think that a fair outcome would result? I can surmise that Carmen, probably quite intelligent, is simply unable to critically evaluate the corruption inherent in the system, since her very professional existence, grotesque as it is, is hopelessly bound up within that very system. She became, simply, an irritant to the host, who promptly expelled her.

Indeed, there are salacious details of a conflict of interest, linking the judge to banking interests, and which upon even a cursory look, reveal the rotting stench of corruption permeating this entire case. Anyway, back to the story.

According to the Complaint, Ms. Segarra set forth four claims: a violation of federal law, specifically, 12 U.S.C. § 1831, a violation of state statutory law, NY Business Law § 349, as well two claims under common law for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, and breach of contract. She added two more state law claims in her First Amended Complaint. For all you Constitutionally challenged types out there, a Federal Court is limited in its jurisdiction. A plaintiff must allege a violation of federal law, or satisfy diversity requirements. Diversity did not exist, since plaintiff and defendants were both from NY. Hence, for the US Federal District Court to have jurisdiction over the case, Ms. Segarra had to allege a violation of federal law.

So, Ms. Segarra alleged the 12 U.S.C. § 1831 claim. This is a technical statute, and Ms. Segarra had to fall within its purview in order to be able to assert a claim under it.

The defense was simple: they moved to dismiss the case based on lack of federal question jurisdiction. That is, the Fed said that Ms. Segarra was not entitled to relief under federal law because the federal law did not apply in her situation. For technical reasons, too arcane, and quite frankly, too boring for me to discuss this late Wednesday night, the Fed’s lawyers successfully persuaded the corrupt District Court judge to dismiss the case. Importantly, the judge dismissed the federal law claim, but did not terminate the case in a fatal manner as to the state law claims.

Thus, Ms. Segarra’s lawsuit is not dead and buried. No, it is just going to have to be litigated in state court, or Ms. Segarra will have to appeal the judge’s ruling dismissing the federal law claim.

Remember, the federal court dismissed the case from FEDERAL COURT, finding that since the federal law cited by Ms. Segarra did not apply, then the FEDERAL COURT was without jurisdiction to adjudicate the remaining STATE LAW CLAIMS.

In the Order dismissing the case, the judge said this:

“Plaintiff invoked the Court’s jurisdiction by asserting that the FAC raised a federal
question. (FAC ¶ 10.) Because the Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim
under 18 U.S.C. § 1831j—her only federal cause of action—it concludes that this is the “the
usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial” such that it should
“declin[e] to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.” Carnegie-Mellon Univ.
v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 n.7 (1988); see also Kolari v. New York-Prebyterian Hosp., 455
F.3d 118, 119 (2d Cir. 2006). It therefore dismisses her state law claims without prejudice.”

The Order is filed as docket entry 51, and the docket entry says this:

“CLERK'S JUDGMENT: It is, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated April 23, 2014, Defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint is granted, Count One fails to state a claim under U.S.C. § 1831j, and the Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims; Plaintiff's motion seeking leave to file a Second Amended Complaint is denied, as are the other requests made in Plaintiff's April 11, 2014 letters; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 04/24/2014) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal)(km) (Entered: 04/24/2014)”

See? The federal law claim is gone, but the state law claims can be refiled in state court.

For reasons known to them, Ms. Segarra’s lawyers filed a notice of appeal, on May 20, 2014.

Let’s see what happens, legally, stay tuned.

Meanwhile, let us not forget the MOPE about the story.

Look at the headline from the traditional media:

“NY Fed wins dismissal of lawsuit by examiner who faulted Goldman.” Story is here: https://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/23/nyfed-goldman-lawsuit-idUSL2N...

While true, it hardly tells the story, now does it?

I would have written the headline like this:

“Fired NY Fed bank examiner’s federal claim dismissed by Judge alleged to have conflict of interest.”

See the difference? What images come to mind based on the different headlines? See how the game is played?

Also, NOWHERE in the mainstream press article, is there a single mention of the reality of the federal judge’s ruling. NY FED did not “win” anything. It was a legal ruling on a technical ground, that is dubious, made by a corrupted federal judge with a clear, and recusal worthy compelling reason to have never sat in judgment on the case at all. The “examiner” was an employee, who sued her employer, for corruption. This use of tame language like “faulted” is laughable. The law does not use terms like “fault.” It uses terms like “failure to use reasonable care,” “fraud,” and “malice.”

Look at this headline: “Heirs of deceased Nicole Brown fault OJ Simpson.” See?

If one looks, one may find an article that delves a little deeper, like here: https://wallstreetonparade.com/2014/05/a-mangled-case-of-justice-on-wall...

But for real news, with no spin, told fairly, one must search out independent viewpoints.

Keep preparing everyone, and do not be afraid to seek out the truth from independent sources.

About the Author

  55 Comments

Dyna mo hum
May 22, 2014 - 12:21pm
Pattaya7
May 22, 2014 - 12:27pm

They will crush her

I hope not but they play a rigged game.

metalsbyamile
May 22, 2014 - 12:28pm

And 2

more bounces will help establish things.

John Galt
May 22, 2014 - 12:32pm

Thurd?

Apparently not. Perhaps I shouldn't have read the post first.

Thanks CL !

May 22, 2014 - 1:25pm

Fabulous, CaL

You are an invaluable asset, Heir Attorney General. Thanks!

squib
May 22, 2014 - 1:55pm

Fantastic CaL

I find it takes time and repetition for people to 'see' how things work with the media and all that is related to the MOPE and other deception.

Thanks for giving us another to exhibit to friends/family waking up and considering preparing in ways they know.

Boswell
May 22, 2014 - 3:14pm

Headlines

I think the headline writers have the most power at any news outlet?

​Often times I supply alternate headlines in the comments sections. ;-)

Nana
May 22, 2014 - 3:36pm

Maybe This Would Have Moved The Claim

She should have moved the court into common law open court of record for her claim.

I woman, Carmen M. Segarra, making claim that I have been wronged, harmed and aggrieved and I require restitution by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

An attorney cannot speak in an open common law court of record without first hand knowledge.....

Bollocks
May 22, 2014 - 3:37pm

Yup, Outrageous CaL

but business-as-usual, eh?

Great write-up .

Stock_Canines
May 22, 2014 - 4:17pm

Subscribe or login to read all comments.

Contribute

Donate Shop

Get Your Subscriber Benefits

Private iTunes feed for all TF Metals Report podcasts, and access to Vault member forum discussions!

Key Economic Events Week of 9/16

9/17 9:15 ET Cap Ute & Ind Prod
9/18 8:30 ET Housing Starts & Bldg Perm.
9/18 2:00 ET Fedlines
9/18 2:30 ET CGP presser
9/19 8:30 ET Philly Fed
9/19 10:00 ET Existing Home Sales

Key Economic Events Week of 9/9

9/10 10:00 ET Job openings
9/11 8:30 ET PPI
9/11 10:00 ET Wholesale Inv.
9/12 8:30 ET CPI
9/13 8:30 ET Retail Sales
9/13 10:00 ET Consumer Sentiment
9/13 10:00 ET Business Inv.

Key Economic Events Week of 9/3

9/3 9:45 ET Markit Manu PMI
9/3 10:00 ET ISM Manu PMI
9/3 10:00 ET Construction Spending
9/4 8:30 ET Foreign Trade Deficit
9/5 9:45 ET Markit Svc PMI
9/5 10:00 ET ISM Svc PMI
9/5 10:00 ET Factory Orders
9/6 8:30 ET BLSBS

Key Economic Events Week of 8/26

8/26 8:30 ET Durable Goods
8/27 9:00 ET Case-Shiller Home Price Idx
8/27 10:00 ET Consumer Confidence
8/29 8:30 ET Q2 GDP 2nd guess
8/29 8:30 ET Advance Trade in Goods
8/30 8:30 ET Pers. Inc. and Cons. Spend.
8/30 8:30 ET Core Inflation
8/30 9:45 ET Chicago PMI

Key Economic Events Week of 8/19

8/21 10:00 ET Existing home sales
8/21 2:00 ET July FOMC minutes
8/22 9:45 ET Markit Manu and Svc PMIs
8/22 Jackson Holedown begins
8/23 10:00 ET Chief Goon Powell speaks

Key Economic Events Week of 8/12

8/13 8:30 ET Consumer Price Index
8/14 8:30 ET Retail Sales
8/14 8:30 ET Productivity & Labor Costs
8/14 8:30 ET Philly Fed
8/14 9:15 ET Ind Prod and Cap Ute
8/14 10:00 ET Business Inventories
8/15 8:30 ET Housing Starts & Bldg Permits

Key Economic Events Week of 8/5

8/5 9:45 ET Markit services PMI
8/5 10:00 ET ISM services PMI
8/6 10:00 ET Job Openings
8/8 10:00 ET Wholesale Inventories
8/9 8:30 ET Producer Price Index

Key Economic Events Week of 7/29

7/30 8:30 ET Personal Inc/Spending & Core Inflation
7/30 10:00 ET Consumer Confidence
7/31 8:15 ET ADP employment
7/31 2:00 pm ET FOMC Fedlines
7/31 2:30 pm ET CGP presser
8/1 9:45 ET Markit Manu PMI
8/1 10:00 ET ISM Manu PMI
8/2 8:30 ET BLSBS
8/2 10:00 ET Factory Orders

Key Economic Events Week of 7/22

7/23 10:00 ET Existing home sales
7/23 10:00 ET Richmond Fed Manu Idx
7/24 9:45 ET flash Markit PMIs
7/25 8:00 ET Count Draghi/ECB policy meeting
7/25 8:30 ET Durable Goods
7/25 8:30 ET Wholesale Inventories
7/26 8:30 ET Q2 GDP first guess

Key Economic Events Week of 7/15

7/15 8:30 ET Empire State Fed Index
7/16 8:30 ET Retail Sales and Import Price Index
7/16 9:15 ET Cap Ute and Ind Prod
7/16 10:00 ET Business Inventories
7/17 8:30 ET Housing Starts and Building Permits
7/18 8:30 ET Philly Fed
7/19 10:00 ET Consumer Sentiment

Forum Discussion

by Boggs, 30 min 3 sec ago
by Boggs, 44 min 30 sec ago
by NW VIEW, 1 hour 35 min ago
by sierra skier, 3 hours 2 sec ago
by Boggs, 5 hours 38 min ago
by Boggs, 5 hours 43 min ago
randomness