story of the new year. Fake News anyone............ Too good to be true........
Say Greenie, you said Jim Sinclair ran a Ponzi scheme, where is your evidence?
How did he do it?
Why do I doubt you didn do nuffin???????????
The stories were obvious BS....................
I laughed till my sides hurt CIA, FBI, got trolled by 4chan too funny.................
Can't make this stuff up, CNN ought to close their doors tomorrow. This was art!!
The sad bit is that it had to be within tolerances for the target. So Golden showers on a bed occupied by the O&M clownshow is AOK - within tolerances.
Trump getting his prostate tickled by an alien with a radioactive choad - not within tolerances.
Again: Golden showers on a bed occupied by the O&M clownshow is AOK - within tolerances.
Do you see?
Be interested in what you think about this
Getting that wedge in there
/pol is always right
flyinkel wrote: Meryl Streep is proving to be a very effective distraction from items of real concern. Who cares what she thinks and chooses to lie about? I don't. Her speech going viral merely demonstrates how "dumbed down" the US audience has become.
Meryl Streep is proving to be a very effective distraction from items of real concern.
Who cares what she thinks and chooses to lie about? I don't.
Her speech going viral merely demonstrates how "dumbed down" the US audience has become.
Good to see you back also my scottish friend. Good to see you and sengfarmer taking an active interest.
I was wondering if anybody else here on the forum believes this statement to be true and why? And if unsubstatiated postulates are ok to make, if so ........ I got a shit load myself.
Nobody said?? Nobody seconded his observation??? Yet, you all like that observation.
Then there was the assertion that there were more important issues to discuss. I was assuming you were going to post an article on disclosure.
And then you expertly copy and pasted a link from Zerohedge, and provided an expert commentary.
You sure did procure and informed, lively discussion followed with expert commentary by the peanut gallery.
I have also noticed that in the last 48 hours, the viewership of DOTs is off the map with new participates.
If my pattern recognition is worth anything, I'd say certain conversations really inspire others to get involved or at least comeback more in a day.
So here is my question,
Why do you think Obama is passing more executive orders in his remaining days as a lame duck President, and why are agencies under Obama passing new laws/edicts/regulations, only days before Trump is inaugurated? And which executive orders do you think, if any, Trump will overturn.
What are the Sun TZu, principles involved here?
Most of you thought that B-I-N-G-O was the clever response. As a matter of fact, a simple posting of a link, proves to be the most popular post in 2017. Holy Shit!! What exactly are we dealing with here?
And for those of you who find that sort of thinking to be of merit, I have a little video for you.
I have some more pattern recognition studies for you....But the day must begin.
Until then, all you BINGO lovers. Looks like the clown has some apprentices.
BINGO, B-I-N-G-O, and Bingo was his name-O
Dear Seng Farmer,
Nice to see you again, after your last contribution to the DOTS forum. Your parting words were less than kind and with a hint of vulgarity. Something about verbosity? Well, so much for civility 24/7 on DOTs. But I do try to match you folks in spirit. Your bedside manner aside, and wishful thinking that I believe that I can have a civilized discussion with people with a history of a reactive nature, your question is still a fair one.
Anybody who makes postulates should indeed be able to support their assertions with a logically congruent, well thought out, lucid case. wouldn't you agree that would be the high standard of a civilized, enlightened group of people.
Part of my answer, will be predicated on fellow members of our community contributing to the conversation through their personal disclosure. Any unwillingness to answer the questions, while you are asking me questions, willl be a vote that you're not as in interested in the truth as your questions suggests.
And so members of the jury, your presence here today. (pacing back and forth)
This proceeding's here today will show the following as it relates to the investment in question that members here essentially invested in what is known as fools gold. Here are my targeted, bullet points:
1) Members of this forum will be asked under oath, sworn on the bible, how much they invested in the property, if they are holding, when they sold, and under what price conditions they sold.
2) What their due diligence was before buying?
3) You will hear about a very simple business model, where owners and directors of a company sell stock, using cash earmarked for corporate overhead, capitalize exploration costs, rinse and repeat.
4) Where a company sells it's stocks at a significant discount, including warrants in privately negotiated transactions to preferred customers and senior directors, who then unload the stock overtime to suckers on the market.
5) Th records will show that the companies raised funds from equity and convertible debt i where the conversion price on debt was at a much lower price the stock price was much higher and the issuance of the original stock was below the market price.
6) I will then call to the stand, three of the top mining analysts/brokers (measured by who made the most money in these markets) and their respective geologists, to share with you the results of their onsite inspection comparing managements claims of finds vs reality. And, ask them why they never issued a buy for their customers.
7) I will then ask members of the DOTS forum that were invited and participated in various townhalls across the country about the future of gold market, how much of the time was spent discussing the fundamentals of gold, and how much of the time was spent tryiing to pawn off one's company as the go to junior mine. I will also be providing my copious notes that were published on a major metals site of what occurred at that town hall under the guise of a workshop on the realities. I will then ask members of DOT's to share, how much of those predictions ever came true?
8.) Lastly, I will show that members here who invested in the fore mentioned property did so without knowledge that they were being outsmarted, persuaded, and influenced during the greatest pump and dump scenario gold has ever seen and that knowingly exploration properties, people who can read the charts, took advantage of this mania, and made awakened gold bugs believe that the great bull market had arrived and made them into the most awakened suckers.
So Sengfarmer, how much did you invest in ...........? And why???? Or were you not expecting that you would actually have to participate.
Thanks for your reply, I think. Hint of vulgarity??? Please expound. Once again you deflect the point of the question with windy bullshit.
As far as an answer why put it all on fellow posters and anonymous "professionals" without naming any? Do you work for the CIA? Your using their same tactics. Many claims no substantiation. "Russian hacking."
Laughably obtuse. Why is it you don't bring up the fact that the whole sector was decimated? Why do you Sinclair haters always act like his is the only company that suffered? Did all the companies in the sector do as you allege he did and run Ponzis?
Yes, I am very much invested in TRX since 2003-4 and I intend to stay the course and see how this plays out. He has kept the company viable and has not given up the resources at these depressed prices.
SilveryBlue wrote: Be interested in what you think about this SB
Interesting to hear the person speaking with Stefan found such difficulty in obtaining the desired title. The Count von Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote a lot of books and papers. He was a product of his time where racism, anti semitism, and the power of the National Socialist (Nazi) state were all rising simultaneously and chose to espouse counter views to their anti semitism but embrace the authoritarian aspects of awesome state without considering if there could be wrong in that entire concept.
I categorize him as just another bog standard ivory tower privileged researcher-writer-social engineer for the elite/his buddies in power who was born into a diplomatic family in a class ridden society with all the sense of superiority that that entails all around him during his formative years. Like the toadies we have today who exist to tell leadership what they want to hear but with the added academic stamp of researched faux-credibility.
I turn my back to fart in his gravestone's general direction. If located in Ireland it would be vandalised once people learned who was buried there.
And Stefan takes the capitalist side, in the process denying or diminishing that capital itself is a weapon in that system used to prevent emergence of any who may compete with those at the top. Or that it required fresh meat, fresh territory, or fresh resources to be sent in from outside to fund the central parasitical state apparatus (just like eg communism which is supposed to be so different). That's a different discussion. Most of what he said he has taken time to research and I agree with. Especially his description of declining standards and covert subversion of societies by internal and external enemies.
But I can take a cyclical view and look upon players like von Coudenhove-Kalergi as necessary philosophical incremental steps of humanity to find an extreme, from which it will recoil towards the opposite extreme at a different time. My take on the subject being discussed is that humanity is range trading during time to locate the boundaries to existence for Homo Sapiens and nobody gets that.
And to lend some context for this I can point to my work describing a 600 approx year cycle Middle East to West, and back again. Within both sides there are smaller cycles (internal to the side) of state dominant to religion dominant and back again. Just the usual mad dog hot summer season, but that scale takes centuries. The same dynamic can be found in smaller fractal scales. Both government and religion are geeks controlling alphas to tame their worst cutthroat excesses, and in so doing placing alpha geeks in charge who then recruit alphas as soldiers to do precisely what their government or religion were supposedly designed to prevent.
There are other models to look at the dynamic, but that's the one I prefer.
I should have included: Stefan draws to attention the tendency of politicians to move towards the place of least resistance. This is very important especially over the long term. It's a long wave drift towards socialist authoritarianism which he describes (and I add: to an extreme reality from which the return wave towards state authoritarianism is reborn and the oscillation creates a societal balance point in between as which there is no pause on the swings from crazy A to crazy B).
Quote: I'd say based on past conversations, with the exception of a couple of people, none of you are professional musicians.
Found cash on the drumset for the New Years gig when I got to rehearsal.
You have hit an interesting analog. The performances you presented (and assuredly the performance discussed) were all passed through pitch corrections systems, among other things. These people discussing the product, not the musician.
I worked with a bass player some years ago. Incredible. We produced an album, loved it. One time signature turned out to be 23/8. Not by design, he was just playing a grove, and I locked on to it. Figured out the math later in preproduction.
Things were great until he pulled out the fretless. Performance was awesome, seriously the guy is a beast. Had we recorded the rest of the material on that bass, we would have been OK. He was slightly flat compared to the fretted bass (mid '70's fender Jazz.) I used the dreaded pitch correction to fix that one song. Never told him.
Now I hear it on every thing. Even old songs on the radio. It always sounds pinched to me.
Animals as Leaders anyone? They have been kicking my ass lately. Of course everyone is using the Fractal setups these days.
Funny story, our keyboard player from some years ago is coming back next rehearsal. I missed that fucker. It's gonna get fun now lol.
This is deflection 101. He wants to put you on the defensive and turn the subject to being about you Seng Farmer rather than GL having to prove his assertion.
Perhaps GL should answer why, exactly, he is paid to be here in the first place.
To distract? To sow discord? To drive legitimate posters away? Several here have said they don't care, they just love his posts. Fine, you need to remember then that you willingly fell victim to a part of an agenda that may not be in your best interests. You chose the fakery, knowingly. So be it. Good luck with that.
And if GL was so knowledgeable on Jim Sinclair being some sort of fake, where are his posts warning others?
If it was some sort of fraud was Jim Sinclair in the background as part of the set-up? The elite realizes it is mass producing currency and needs a way to reign in the concerned citizens so they create the great "buy gold at it's highest" scheme to lure in those aware of the USD fraud? You trap and bankrupt the true patriots voicing concern over the fraudulent banking system, set them up for failure? And then plunge the gold price? Was Jim Sinclair in on it? Or just off on his timing of when gold would rise?
If Jim Sinclair was such a fraud, his land should be worthless, right? So why were hired thugs sent to overrun his fences? Wouldn't that be a complete waste of time/energy/money on a tanzanian dirt pile? It doesn't make sense. And neither does GL much of the time.
It does make sense govvie thugs would try to take down those standing up bravely to warn the populace. Why? Because the govvie folks are dependent on the govvie dime so they need, and want, the control structure in place, they can't handle possible fractures to the system. Truth doesn't matter (just like the CIA adding in Russian spies to the fraudulent golden showers post), CONTROL, by any means, is the only thing that matters. That's your current govvie.
So, again, GL should answer why, exactly, he is paid to be here in the first place.