Those running the show would have us believe guns are a problem, but what about those we see for medical care,,,,,, it appears our medical providers are an even bigger problem.
As always the full story at the link.
Medical malpractice kills 500 times more Americans than accidental gun deaths… we need DOCTOR control
Wednesday, September 26, 2018 by: Isabelle Z.
Tags: bad doctors, bad medicine, badhealth, badmedicine, causes of death, Dangerous Medicine, gun control, gun deaths, malpractice, malpractice deaths, media shutout, medical error, medical mistakes, medical violence
(Natural News) We’ve all heard the statistics about accidental gun deaths in the U.S. Many of them are overblown, of course, but even one death is too many. However, when these statistics are put in perspective by comparing them to other types of accidental death, it’s even more tragic; medical malpractice kills 500 times more Americans than accidental gun deaths do! Doesn’t that mean there should be 500 times more calls for doctor control than gun control?
The shocking data on malpractice deaths is quite solid. It was taken from an eight-year study from the reputable Johns Hopkins University, who found that there are at least 250,000 deaths due to malpractice in America each year. That’s bad enough on its own, but CNBC reported that number is actually on the low end as other studies have found such deaths surpass 400,000 per year. Because physicians, coroners, and funeral directors rarely note human errors on death certificates and these are what the CDC relies on to post death statistics, such cases are dramatically underreported. Either way, it’s safe to say that a minimum of 250,000 people die from medical malpractice each year.
How many people die accidentally at the hands of a gun each year? 500. Again, 500 lives lost is still devastating, but it’s clear that a disproportionate amount of public outrage is directed toward guns compared to doctors who make mistakes. Even when you look at overall gun deaths rather than just accidental ones – throwing homicides and suicides into the mix as well – you’ll get figures like 2015’s 36,000. Two thirds of those, by the way, were suicides. So even when you consider intentional gun deaths, the number of malpractice deaths each year is still seven times higher.
This story relates to the science involved in the medical industry, but the corruption are rampant across the field including climate change. You have to remember that many of these scientists are paid by government grants and in an effort to remain employed they give the results desired by their bosses.
The balance of the article is at the link below.
Top U.S. scientists forced to resign over allegations of corruption and false studies
Wednesday, September 26, 2018 by: Tracey Watson
Tags: badmedicine, badscience, Brian Wansink, citizen science, Collapse, conflicts of interest, Gilbert Welch, Jose Baselga, junk science, real investigations, science, science clowns, scientific integrity, truth
(Natural News) Integrity and incorruptibility are qualities that we have every right to expect from the pillars of the scientific community. Shockingly, however, these pillars seem to be crumbling right before our eyes.
Agence France-Presse (AFP) recently reported that two of the most prominent scientists in the United States have been pressured to resign in the past few days, after it was reported that their methods revealed both their lack of integrity and susceptibility to corruption. (Related: The scientific fraud pandemic; few honest scientists remain.)
How the mighty have fallen
One of the most respected scientists in his field, José Baselga, chief medical officer at New York’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, is the published author of hundreds of articles featuring the most cutting-edge cancer research. The New York Times called him “one of the world’s top breast cancer doctors” and “a towering figure in the cancer world.”
On 8 September, two mainstream media publications – The New York Times and Pro Publica – revealed that Baselga had failed to disclose the fact that he had received millions of dollars from Big Pharma and medical corporations.
Scientists and researchers are expected to reveal this type of conflict of interest, since links between pharmaceutical or medical companies and scientists can bias a researcher’s methods and results. Unfortunately, scientific journals do not investigate to establish these types of ties, relying on the scientists themselves to be honorable and reveal them. (Related: Scientific fraud published in reputable medical journals has soared more than 1,700 percent since 2004, says report.)
Having failed to disclose his links to Big Pharma and being outed by the media, Baselga tendered his resignation on September 13.
Brian Wansink, director of the Food and Brand Lab at the Ivy League Cornell University, sent the next shock-wave through the scientific community. Wansink became famous for his work examining the health effects of pizza and what affects the appetites of children. His Cornell bio calls him “a leading expert in changing eating behavior – both on an individual level and on a mass scale — using principles of behavioral science.” It adds that he is the author of two books which have been translated into 25 different languages, as well as over 200 peer-reviewed journal articles.
Then, last year, investigators raised the alarm about what AFP refers to as the “surprisingly positive results in dozens of his articles.” Messages he sent to a researcher encouraging her to edit her findings to remove results that might cause an upset and “go viral,” were also leaked to the media.
After a year of intensive investigation, the university announced last week that Wansink’s methodology and results were problematic and that he was guilty of “academic misconduct in his research and scholarship, including misreporting of research data, problematic statistical techniques, failure to properly document and preserve research results, and inappropriate authorship.”
Wansink has announced that he will resign at the end of the academic year, and the university has revoked his teaching privileges with immediate effect. In addition, although he has denied all accusations against him, 13 of Wansink’s published articles have been retracted by scientific journals.
The tip of the iceberg
Adding to the post above.
This ALL ties in with the link I posted years ago to, Resurrect The Republic, site. It is all being exposed if you pay attention.
The globalist believed they owned us...
Not arguing the information re Soros and his WW2 collaboration life phase/survive and prosper strategy.
But when you use a Q source, you're accessing an "educate-the-masses" cum "jolly-along-the-maga-supporters-while-little-material-change-is-really-happening" propaganda project.
So, the specific info nugget referred to may be accurate, but the source used is far from neutral and is designed to protect the new administration from sentiment change resulting from its non delivery of change.
Thus over reliance on Q sourced info will slowly shift your perceptions from a solid objective base towards a Trump sympathetic one.
In my humble opinion this creates (if one is to retain balance of perception) a need to then read a little more NYT or HuffPo to redress tilted sources present in the inventory of incoming information, and while their book reviews or cooking columns might be good, objectivity retention becomes more slippery with increased volume of all public arena information taken in.
Q in other words is a boomer pacification project, and an attempt to pass on 1950s-80s actual news to people born after the boomer period to boost the Republican-military demographic and at the same time (informationally speaking) to erode or reduce growth of the Democrat-anti-military-millennial educational system working on youth, by hooking web "autists" etc puzzle solving and gaming enthusiasm to figure these vague announcements out and teach them right wing doubts of socialism, communism, things Democrat etc, get them to read about JFK's death, and so on.
In my humble opinion its not neutral, though your point is absolutely valid.
Prophecy Update End Times News Headlines - 12/5/18
Nothing written is ever neutral, it's that simple.
STRANGE Signs Of "EndTimes'' Happening NOW (2018)
It is impossible to know when the End Times have started, yet that does not prevent people from trying.
Is it wrong to be a false prophet?
Is it wrong to listen, knowing in advance that this is not a prophet, nor an access to truth any more than to roll a die is.
Yet we can’t stop it, being human and wanting to know such important things, moreover to tell others, and at the same time push our own agenda. In short to use people by the words of The Bible .
But you won’t stop, and can’t stop. Will you admit it though?
You ask: "Is it wrong to be a false prophet?" It has never been "right' or good and one who is, is in big spiritual trouble. There have been false ones from the beginning and even multitudes of them today. It is difficult to stop the madness, as they say "the Lord spoke to me or Jesus appeared to me". It is their testimony. They are on dangerous ground.
For many, the safest position is to "have eyes to see and ears to hear", watching the events of the world and the Kingdom of God, backed by having "Christ within", knowing His Voice and following Him only. In this position, one could give an opinion, on a spiritual subject, not backing it up as "prophet Jones", but letting the hearer or reader know that this is "jmo".
The real prophets are not welcome in the assemblies of men and demons. The O.T. prophets, the ones sent by the Lord, were usually killed by the clergy of the day and the real ones today are "outside the camp". The days are coming when true prophets will come forth, giving a clear message of repentance, calling the assemblies to true separation from the world and the man made divisions of religion. Tribulations will come quickly and this will wake up a sleeping Body for "who so ever will". Yes, jmo. Jim
Your response tells me you didn't watch/listen to the video yet commented on it. Reading books by the cover never tells the contents.
I heard every word he said
I wish I didn't.
Always with the negative waves ... those negative waves ... think positive Nana! The globalists are living in their own worst nightmare now. It's all coming apart for them.
Hi AM good to see a post or two from you :-)
Is it coming apart because what they are trying to accomplish is not natural, even though they think it is natural?
Perhaps its not nice to fool with mother nature and there is a self correcting force?
Maybe the pendulum is about to swing the other way?
Silver66 Rage against the dying of the light
The entire story can be read at the provided link.
AMAZING science lesson from Adams: Environmentalists declare war on photosynthesis in stupefying effort to exterminate all recognizable life on planet Earth
Friday, December 07, 2018 by: Mike Adams
(Natural News) We were all taught how photosynthesis works in high school… or at least you should have been taught how it works. Photosynthesis is arguably the single most important metabolic process on the planet, and it is from this process that nearly all complex life is sustainted.
Photosynthesis is a process by which plants produce metabolic energy. Using this energy combined with elemental materials pulled from air and soil, they build tree trunks, food crops, leaves, pollen, seeds, stems and everything you’ve come to associate with living plants. Even alga use photosynthesis to grow and divide, which is why microalgae such as spirulina require sunlight to flourish.
Photosynthesis is the foundation of most food webs on the planet. Any rational scientist would agree that if photosynthesis were halted, nearly all recognizable life on planet Earth would be exterminated. This is inarguable.
Photosynthesis has three inputs:
1) Sunlight – a source of light energy
2) Carbon dioxide – an essential source of carbon, used by plants to build almost everything that plants need
3) Water – used by plants to maintain structure, circulate metabolic nutrients, etc.
Why do these three inputs matter so much? Because environmentalists have declared WAR on two out of those three: Sunlight and carbon dioxide.
Environmentalists are at war with photosynthesis and all plant life on planet Earth