So for all of you waiting for "A few good men" to rise up in some alphabet agency and restore law and order to the United States, I'm very sorry to report, there's no such thing. You've been had.
I told you so.
If you've placed your faith in government to fix government, you are in for a very rude awakening.
Green Lantern, the way I read one of your posts last night, seems like you are assuming that the powers that be want some kind of peaceful transfer of power.
We will either have open warfare, followed by a totalitarian dictatorship, after massive casualties,
or we can just skip all that, and go directly to a totalitarian lockdown.
Just so you know, the globalists are determined to take over America dead or alive, and they prefer as much death as possible.
Since the Trump supporters have all the guns, the election will go to Hillary.
Like I keep saying, the plan is to piss off as many people as possible, drive them into revolt, then wipe them out.
As far as I'm concerned, anyone who pays their taxes after this, should be declared an enemy of humanity, and a co-conspirator in the crimes against humanity committed regularly by the establishment.
The arguments between those who think that our government is illegitimate, and those that know that there is no such thing, is a mute point now. If your religious convictions cause you to believe that governments are installed by some imaginary sky daddy as our earthly rulers, you clearly worship the devil.
This only gets fixed by breaking the spell, and convincing all those who follow orders for a living that they are employed by Satan himself. Yeah, I don't believe in that crap, but a lot of people do.
Just by judging how my own personal contempt for government has gone over on this forum, I don't consider many of these mindnumbed robots called police or military to be reachable with logic, reason, or commonsense.
We've got one advantage left, they will all be in uniform. At least the enemies of humanity will be easily identifiable.
They must die, so we can live.
My words might seem over-the-top today, but now that you've read them, I would encourage you to just put it in the back of your head, and reconsider it after another month or so. The likelihood of us having our own little community here to discuss such things might be wishful thinking, and I'm not looking forward to the "I told you so" that some of you will richly deserve.
Law and order has to be established from neighborhood to neighborhood. Only natural laws will work to unite people at this point. Treat people the way you want to be treated, Jesus Christ could not have made it simpler.
In nature, there is only one rule. The Golden Rule.
Kill those who simply won't allow that to happen. It is your right, and your duty.
This transference of power is for all of the marbles. We will either give ourselves over to the state, or we will free ourselves.
Stop pretending that the elections matter. At least our government isn't pretending anymore.
Have a nice day.
Mr. Fix wrote: Green Lantern, the way I read one of your posts last night, seems like it you are assuming that the powers that be want some kind of peaceful transfer of power.
Green Lantern, the way I read one of your posts last night, seems like it you are assuming that the powers that be want some kind of peaceful transfer of power.
I've never hijacked a car before but my guess is that the hijackers would rather you just give them the keys than they forcibly take it. The only reason to use force is when what you want is not given to you.
The analog I'm looking at as a possibility was actually a very bloody take over. Not an easy one to find. I'm not saying it happens like that. I'm just saying that it looks to me that HRC bankers are willing to use force and coehersion to hold their power and the other side the same to take it. This is one of those things I have to really think about and look at carefully.
There is either more propaganda than I've ever witnessed in my life, or I am just more aware of it which would make it seem like this is the worse I've ever seen. I occasionally go back and look at past election speeches and dynamics.
I am happy that Tuesday is my wife's day off so I don't have to escort her home. My guess is I'll see a major militarized police presence but that's not unusual in Gotham.
Agenda 21 specifically speaks of depopulation, and a bloody Civil War is perfectly consistent with such an agenda.
As far as cycles are concerned, I don't think this particular election compares to any of the others in US history, and you might need to go back to the fall of the Roman empire to find something analogous to current events.
It's been rigged so that the outcome of this selection doesn't matter in the least. It's war either way.
Quite frankly, I don't think a population as emasculated as ours has much of a fight in it.
You might recall my question to Argentis Maximus concerning the possibility of a 24,000 year cycle playing out.
Admittedly, this would make finding a historical reference somewhat problematic, but it seems relevant to me.
You've got a great awakening versus the evisceration of human consciousness.
Maybe you'd like to take a stab at it, I've only started looking at cycles in the past month or so.
For the past few years, many have assumed that somehow, the system would be saved. I've been working from the premise that it is intentionally being destroyed. The United States government is very much a part of the system, and I think that it's intentional destruction is worthy of consideration.
That would certainly make this particular election cycle not quite like all the others.
Mr. Fix wrote: So for all of you waiting for "A few good men" to rise up in some alphabet agency and restore law and order to the United States, I'm very sorry to report, there's no such thing. You've been had. I told you so. If you've placed your faith in government to fix government, you are in for a very rude awakening. Green Lantern, the way I read one of your posts last night, seems like you are assuming that the powers that be want some kind of peaceful transfer of power. Nope. We will either have open warfare, followed by a totalitarian dictatorship, after massive casualties, or we can just skip all that, and go directly to a totalitarian lockdown. Just so you know, the globalists are determined to take over America dead or alive, and they prefer as much death as possible. Since the Trump supporters have all the guns, the election will go to Hillary. Like I keep saying, the plan is to piss off as many people as possible, drive them into revolt, then wipe them out.
I disagree with the above. "Trump supporters have all the guns, the election will go to Hillary"
Those with the guns will are "God fearing people" who for the most part are very slow to anger. They are not criminals and will require a great deal of hostility to move...
If you want to "Achieve" the violence you speak of, then TRUMP most be the winner. The simple reason is that the liberals who vote for Clinton are easy to anger and easy to provoke. They will be the ones who quickly ignite the violence. In all honesty, because the government is their _od and will feel threatened in all facets of their existence because "their feeders" will show up with nothing but fear to feed them...
I do not disagree that violence will ensue just a different way to get there...
This reminds me of the day before the Y2K event. The majority had a view of an immediate day of doom and death, they had their bug out bags and we're ready for death to come down their streets. We warned them that nothing would happen and nothing would change.
You could have said that the Lord has taken Linda and I out of the country, to protect us, for a season as the nation burns. Or you could said we are just here for treatments.
My view is not a new one. This Babylon will be destroyed and that timing is written and will be under His control. Two may view the battlefield from two differing mountain tops and miss the forces at work. Well, things will shake a bit but Thanksgiving is still coming, the cows give their milk, the apples will grow on the trees and the Lord is not moved over an election. Jmo Jim
Let me emphasize, the outcome of the election doesn't matter. Which ever victory can create the most carnage, that will be the preferred outcome from the perspective of those who are counting the votes..
If you're worried about Black Lives Matter, ISIS, or any other mercenary group, don’t. They are just bought and paid for actors, and there's not enough of them to create any kind of genuine Civil War.
If Trump wins, they can only pretend to have a civil war, the majority won't fight.
If however Hillary wins, you will have a genuine good versus evil battle, and the combatants won't have to be paid for their performance.
Of course, the hired mercenaries Will create chaos regardless of who wins.
Remember, Obama stays.
I'm having a bit of a computer glitch, all the pages on this website keep scrolling down to the bottom so I can't even read the posts.
Hopefully, this gets fixed soon.
Jim, the fact that you and Linda are in Mexico, could certainly be divine intervention, and a nice safe place to watch the fireworks show.
So instead of messing with my computer all day, I'm going to go pretend that I'm a carpenter.
You all have a nice day.
Mr. Fix wrote: .... As far as cycles are concerned, I don't think this particular election compares to any of the others in US history, and you might need to go back to the fall of the Roman empire to find something analogous to current events....
You don't remember back 4 years or twice that? Same everything, with higher volume, higher insanity. But it's eight years since an executive change in the crew. What else takes eight years? Do you know the cycle of the beast? (Now I just lost 3/4 of everybody reading this! )
Mr. Fix wrote: .... You might recall my question to Argentis Maximus concerning the possibility of a 24,000 year cycle playing out.
I have however put out there a lot of periods which are very noticeable for those who look once advised, and which are finite enough for mortals to see the change. You have to eat, that's a more manageable "cycle"! A suitable cycle length for big change is your life to date divided by possibly two or three. That way you may just possibly recollect enough change of circumstances to believe it. Later on, go large if you wish to do so. But it's not a good way to begin. Could you do the long jump at age two or was learning to walk first a better approach. Not being sarky, just pointing towards what I think is a more fruitful line of enquiry.
On the 24,000 years thing ... a superficial approach might be to say "The world is fractal" and notice also that somebody thought that 24 hours in a day seemed a good idea. And their idea seems to have lasted for some reason. So, who was that, and how good was their geo-astro-climactic maths, and consider if their conclusion for that time unit should be scaleable? Or not? Because on 24,000 year waves, other evidence is sketchy to say the least what with climategate and other assorted little problems. This reminds me of when I investigated the 7 year cycle, and wrote some of that up, and effectively said "Meh, it's there but weak, I prefer both 6 and 8 over seven". But the seven stuff is still out there and still comes back periodically. How long did it take this time? Not that that matters when a thing has been dismissed. Seven is merely important because it is a prime number, and therefore some things of more than seven units , if subdivided can not go below seven due to it's prime-ness. So it's a building block dimension for some stuff. One of many.
Mr. Fix wrote: .... You've got a great awakening versus the evisceration of human consciousness.
Mr. Fix wrote: .... That would certainly make this particular election cycle not quite like all the others.
Thanks for the reply, yeah, using such a long cycle would be problematic. Few seem to be able to agree on that particular part of history.
I fully agree that my late night listening choices has put me so far out of the mainstream, that I don't even have a credible point of reference.
I'll be pondering your reply as I chop wood, and nail it together today.
As for the great awakening versus the evisceration of consciousness, this still very much needs to play out.
I like your LSD reference, as those who are paying any attention to this process at all are being fed such an epic pile of bullshit, only time can tell what conclusions will be drawn over the next few months/years.
In the meantime, I'm probably better off not focusing on the national picture, my local government is every bit as corrupt as anything in Washington DC.
I've got my work cut out for me right here.
I posted yesterday, elsewhere, phase conjugation cancelation. You cancel the first wave, by duplicating it a second time. Known as erasure. Actually, Zerohedge wrote about it months ago, I just found a cute name for getting rid of
I like this and I liked it the first time I posted Farrell saying the same thing with a bit of variation.
@ScottAdamsSays FBI development helps Trump. Election is now a referendum on corruption & establishment, not Trump's temperament. Thoughts?
Scott Adams added,
Correct. But it's too late to change many minds.
Or as Farrell put it: A referendum between the Old Grand chess board strategy and the recognition that it's not working and going elsewhere with a new group coming online.
Because they said it, doesn't make it right but both seem like reasonable observations. I like Farrell's version a little bit better and I think it more accurate.
Fix: I'm not worried about depopulation. I don't see how it can work and if it can work than I'll worry about it when It gets here. My guess is we'll all notice. Escorting my wife home during a highly contested election would just be an act of precaution. Halloween is also a good time to do it. I know how to get around better than she does if detours are necessary. The majority of people that travel late at night home for work, only want to get home and go to sleep.
I'm not implying any 24,000 year cycle. I'm not implying any type of great flood, the anti-christ coming etc... I've studied enough of this stuff to know that history starts to get really murky of what happened that far back and plus I've said the dates for some grand catastrophe have been miscalculated and the majority of the non-statist history writers are looking at something different than what they are thinking they are looking at. I'm not looking at a Fourth Turning, or some great ending where a hole in the earth swallows 10,000 people.
And even if there is a 24,000 cycle at work, or a 12,000 or a 3000 or whatever, that doesn't mean that what is relevant is the part of the story everybody knows about and everything falls into the ocean. It can be just groups of people working out old things in a similar way with new costumes.
How do I know I'm not hallucinating and I'm not making stuff up that is relevant? I don't have 100% absolute certainty except on the following idea's which I have certainty on. It doesn't mean you will.
All you have to decide is whether or not I'm living in a comic book world with imaginary super hero's doing super human things or I've managed to keep some sense of reality and avoid a delusional episode if even a little bit.
I am currently imaging that people poking fun at idea's of imaginary strings/vs free will, fibonacci sequences (sometimes those cartoons are humorous) whether or bringing forward an analog outside US history to discuss would be a really smart idea especially if 3/4's of the readers here got lost with the cycle of the beast. Then I would also be obligated to share how I arrived at it as a future possibility.
Maybe these type of posts that jest at these concepts have an intention besides some light hearted banter. Not as overt or controversial as saying, why do you post this stuff here? Nonetheless, the message seems to be the same.
If I was a shy sort of guy, I might be intimidated or ashamed about talking about this type of stuff. Seems to me that has worked for a looong time.
argentus maximus wrote: Consciousness is a scarce resource, in short supply even among those who talk about it. (Including me!)
Consciousness is a scarce resource, in short supply even among those who talk about it. (Including me!)
I hear what you are saying. I really, really do!! It was said a little louder than the rest, or maybe I just heard it louder. But I couldn't disagree with you more, respectfully, and maybe it wasn't so much a commentary on the nature of consciousness.
This gets into sort of one of those religious or spiritual conversations (whichever you prefer) where nobody is really right because truth in that moment is whatever you perceive it.
So if all life is consciousness (and not everybody here believes that) that includes the flowers in your garden, than consciousness might be the only thing on earth that is not in short supply. Without consciousness, none of us would be here. I have a feeling you might see it similarly.
But maybe you meant higher consciousness??? I don't want to put words in your mouth. You know those few rarified type of people who see things in a way most of us can't.
Maybe they exist, maybe they don't. Maybe they only existed 2000 years ago and suddenly ***Poof**** it never happened again. That was the end of that cycle. I think that's what you call a one time event.
Or maybe consciousness is like a spiral staircase ever so slowly and imperceptibly rising. 2000 years ago they didn't have toilets, modern refrigeration, computers, or doctors who could take your appendix out with miniature equipment. Something has improved and I suspect that represents some rise in awareness of what creation means. Eventually all the 100 monkeys figured out that they could wash their potato's instead of eating sand. Word gets around.
Or maybe consciousness is like a sliding scale or better yet a house with many mansions where no two people inhabit the same room in that mansion which accounts for so many diverse opinions on politics, finances and religions. There has to be some reason a group of awakened people can't reach a consensus on how the world works?
I once heard it said, by somebody who might have more of this consciousness stuff than I do, that it is not the amount of power than an individual has, it's how much they realize. That would make us all equal? Despite iq or origins.
So I'd disagree that a person who looks at invisible forces in the world, understands it and makes a living explaining it to other people is really devoid of this stuff. It might even represent 'higher' consciousness, not that I have a good measurement tool. And maybe even Gann's appearance in the world, Dewey's publication represented a lift in consciousness for humanity that harkened back to earlier times. Maybe there are more analogs to the past than any one of us can ever see. And maybe not?
Let's go with the carjacking analogy, because if you think that all they want is to steal an election, it probably works.
But let's dig a little deeper, because you're assuming that the carjacker, just wants the car, just like the elite just want to win another election.
This doesn't take into account past crimes.
So what I propose, is a more accurate analogy, where you're confronted with a carjacker, who has already killed your wife, raped your children, killed them, surreptitiously stole all the wealth from your entire community, and so far, has not been caught. He needs a little bit more than the getaway car, especially since you are the sole survivor who can identify him for his crimes.
When this economic system implodes, and it certainly will, people are going to ask "Where did all the money go?"
This leads right back to your carjacker/ globalist. From their perspective, they can get away with their crimes free and clear, if all those who could claim they've been wronged are dead.
Now would such a carjacker simply ask for the keys? Or would his primary motive for confronting you, in your car, be to splatter your brains all over the pavement, before making a clean getaway.
That's the problem with so many people noticing what's going on around them. They can't be allowed to live to tell about it.
Don't forget, history still needs to be rewritten. (Again). Individual liberty, individual sovereignty and freedom along with free and fair markets need to be demonized to the point where anyone advocating such principles will be clearly identified as an enemy of humanity.
We have reached a point similar to that of humanity a couple hundred years after Christ walked to the earth.
People were taught the way, the truth, and the light, and started to live it with extraordinary results.
Popes and Emperors needed to conspire to annihilate such thinking. It's not enough that their books were burned, they still had oral traditions. Genocide was the only possible solution to maintain their control.
We have now reached a couple hundred years since the American experiment showed the world exactly what freedom could accomplish.
If you belong to one of those families who have worked to keep humanity enslaved throughout all of recorded history, not only do you need to kill all those that think in such ways, you also need to kill everyone with a memory, and anyone still capable of independent thought.
That's still a lot of people.
Once that's accomplished, the powers that be can go back to routine carjacking as a "business as usual" model.
Right now, they've got one hell of a mess to cleanup, and a shit load of truth to suppress.
They also have to tip their hand in the process, exposing for anyone with any moral clarity whatsoever exactly who and what they are.
They're going for all the marbles, or they will toss the gameboard, with as much scorched earth as possible.
In this scenario, until carjacking is a capital offense, with justice dealt right at the curbside, they will just keep coming back for more, after they take your car, they will systematically go down the street, and take everything that can be taken, while killing everyone who sees.
That was just a tad overly dramatic, but sometimes that happens when we play with analogies.
With a slight twist. The thieves and robbers have stolen almost everything. They "think" that they have all the power and wealth of the universe. They have tried to redirect any thinking that does not feed their agenda.
Then it happens, in a flash of time, these wicked ones are removed as the Rambo of the universe cleans up the mess. He gives the deed to all things for those who have followed His Way. He shortens those days before the evil ones destroy all of mankind. Those who remain will inherit all the good and finally have Peace. Jim
All I am saying is that there are two hidden factions of financial and geopolitical interests. The ones behind Clinton and the ones behind Trump. Forget who is meaner, who is cleaner and who is going to be better for the country, if any.
One wants to get into the driver seat. All the other things like liberty, sovereignty etc.... I don't see either one giving us alot of those things.
AM referred to a map a few posts ago. That's the essence of what might going on. Do they continue with the old strategy or is the team looking to do something else. I don't see those in power as one monolithic identity all agreeing on our future.
My only hypothesis, and it doesn't relate to tomorrow night, is that whoever wins, the other faction doesn't go away and we have this underworld, plutonian thing going on with wikileaks or whoever the players are tring to take the other side down.
That's it. And the other part, all I am saying is that there are traces/remnants and hints of things that happened in the past that could be tried again and might fit nicely. I've reached out to other people that I know who are very familar with these historical events to see if they see if it fits nicely here. If I can upload some of the documents, I'll share them with you. It's a bit of a pain but I ain't typing it up.
Armstrong said this doesn't resolve itself until after the new year. I don't remember if he was referring to an 18 year corruption cycle. The Nixon cycle....
But now multiple news sources are reporting that the NYC PD has enough information to put Hillary in jail. Who is the NYPD in bed with? HIllary or Trump/Guiliani and the former corrupt police commissioner? They have also mysteriously canceled Hillary's celebration party which including fireworks without comment.
Local law enforcement is subordinate to the FBI. NYPD's connection to the establishment "seems" more connected to the TRump camp. I don't know the inner politics but our commie Mayor is Clinton
This doesn't end tomorrow. The forces that have risen don't disappear and will continue to try to place themselves in power-election or no election.
Rambo of the universe will save us?
Now I've got to clean the Diet Coke off my keyboard!
The named "Manhattan Prosecutor" is Preet Bharara
He's the US Attorney (they are part of the Department of Justice) and a Democrat, don't hold your breath. You might put Erik Prince on your "verify his claims before repeating them to anybody" list. (along with Steve Pieczenik, Ted Butler, and anything found on King World News)
Preetinder Singh "Preet" Bharara (born 1968) is an Indian-born naturalized American attorney and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Earning a reputation of a "Crusader" prosecutor, his office has prosecuted diplomats and people in other countries. He prosecuted nearly 100 Wall Street executives, reached historic settlements and fines with the four largest banks in the US, and closed multibillion-dollar hedge funds for activities including insider trading. He also prosecuted New York state politicians, including the Speaker of the New York State Assembly, Sheldon Silver and the Majority Leader of State Senate, Dean Skelos, and at one time he threatened to prosecute the governor Andrew Cuomo for alleged corruption.[ 13]
I forget the name of the website, but it was discussed here a couple years ago or so, as I recall. The website was for military weaponry mostly, but had an area that discussed future populations of countries. The U.S. was going to be decimated by 2020, now just 3 years away..
Again, as I recall, the guy who runs that site said he had no inside info, just what it seemed to him. I think he was looking at loss of dollar supremacy, recognition of government bankruptcy, and ultimately the loss of dollar and government legitimacy. Meaning, the welfare state collapses. Cities go rogue, as the dollar becomes worthless. Sort of a Mad Max scenario, but not due to nuclear destruction, but dollar destruction.
Mr. Fix, you said anyone who pays taxes feeds the beast, and everyone should just stop. As an independent contractor, you are able to control what income you declare, and the taxes you pay. As a business owner, you can decide what your expenses are, and pay (or not) accordingly.
Unfortunately, for most people who are employees of businesses, the tax withholding law is a big obstacle. It was ingenius for the govy to have created this monstrosity back in the late 40's or early 50's when the amount of actual taxes paid by the multitudes was still very low. But, like the proverbial frog in a slowly heated kettle of water, we now accept this horrible law.
Anyway, taxes are of little importance, really, in a debt-based world. Taxes are more for control now, than revenue.
I wonder why Trump would want to be president. When you really think about it, I think he actually might be genuine--that he wants to make America great again--or at the very least, stop the fasttrack into the 3rd World. He has a lot to lose if we down the shitter, as do his children, grandchildren, etc.
Of course, HRC has a lot to lose, too. The criminal cabal that protects her and the even more criminal Clinton Foundation might decide she is no longer needed if she can't keep the people blindfolded.
Regardless what happens tomorrow, many, many people have learned something that makes them no longer innocent sheep; and once learned, it cannot be unlearned. We might be turning a corner. I hope.
Nick Elway wrote: The named "Manhattan Prosecutor" is Preet Bharara He's the US Attorney (they are part of the Department of Justice) and a Democrat, don't hold your breath. You might put Erik Prince on your "verify his claims before repeating them to anybody" list. (along with Steve Pieczenik, Ted Butler, and anything found on King World News) Wikipedia: Preetinder Singh "Preet" Bharara (born 1968) is an Indian-born naturalized American attorney and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Earning a reputation of a "Crusader" prosecutor, his office has prosecuted diplomats and people in other countries. He prosecuted nearly 100 Wall Street executives, reached historic settlements and fines with the four largest banks in the US, and closed multibillion-dollar hedge funds for activities including insider trading. He also prosecuted New York state politicians, including the Speaker of the New York State Assembly, Sheldon Silver and the Majority Leader of State Senate, Dean Skelos, and at one time he threatened to prosecute the governor Andrew Cuomo for alleged corruption.[ 13]
It's a good point but he did send Sheldon Silver up the river. We all watched him put a life long corrupt politician in jail. A democrat to boot. He seems like a tough cookie, no nonsense. He says he's not interested in politics. Whatever that means, but his eye's look like he'd go ape crazy on whoever he goes after. https://www.worth.com/the-power-of-attorney/
All the right players will fall together if it's meant to be. There are people, whatever small minority, that will take down child rapists, no matter of party affiliation. A couple of sex pictures would be more powerful than ten pages of wikileaks.