What Western Elites and the "Gaystapo" Have in Common: Self-Destructive, Suicidal Arrogance

167
Fri, Apr 4, 2014 - 5:35pm

In case you hadn't heard, Firefox CEO Brendan Eich resigned over pressure from...get this...a dating website. The problem? Years ago, he donated to Proposition 8 in California, which defined marriage as being between a man and a woman. Proposition 8 passed in California, despite the Left Coast's reputation for being a pro-gay paradise.

So for having a mainstream view, this man was targeted, attacked, and ousted from his job - all thanks to the "Gaystapo."

I first heard the term "Gaystapo" from Kevin DuJan, a former Hillary Clinton campaign volunteer who turned conservative...and oh, by the way, he is gay, Catholic, and has publicly stated his opposition to gay marriage. "Gaystapo" refers to a certain extremist segment of the gay rights movement that not only wants equality under the law, but demands thought compliance from everyone about homosexuality. If you are not 100% behind gay marriage, you are to be shunned, ridiculed, driven from your job, and made a persona non grata.

(Kevin DuJan is a great example of the true diversity of America. He can't be segmented into a marketing demographic. He doesn't kowtow to group-think. And for that, he's been the target of much heavy criticism from certain folks in the gay community, who find his independence of thought threatening.)

I lived in California in 2008, and I was able to vote on Proposition 8. For the record, I voted against the proposition, in favor of a more libertarian position on gay marriage. Behind me, in the line at the voting place, was a nice Hispanic man who was having trouble understanding the wording of Proposition 8 on the ballot. He asked for my help.

I told him: "This proposition is about gay marriage. If you vote for it, you are voting for traditional marriage between a man and a woman. If you vote against it, you are voting in favor of gay marriage."

"Oh no no no, gay marriage?? I am not for that!!" he said. "Thank you!"

I knew he was canceling out my vote, but I had enough respect for him to tell him the truth and not lie to him about what was on the ballot.

Sadly, this respect is sorely lacking among the "Gaystapo." My first, direct encounter with them was when a good friend of mine was targeted by them. This friend, like Brendan Eich, had donated to Proposition 8 due to being a Catholic. My friend worked for a very large entertainment company in a management position. Personal information, including the amount of the Proposition 8 donation, was passed around to gay rights activists, who proceeded to contact the company in an attempt to get my friend fired.

Fortunately, the company declined to act.

My friend forwarded one of these blacklist emails to me. I wrote the guy and lambasted him for presuming my friend was homophobic, when, in fact, my friend was in favor of civil unions and we had mutual gay friends. That did not matter to this guy, who wrote me back telling me that anyone who supported Proposition 8 needed to be punished.

My friend was lucky - no job was lost. Additionally, Proposition 8 opponents actually went so far as to publish maps with the home addresses of many donors to Proposition 8 - an invasion of privacy my friend fortunately did not have to suffer.

I bring up this personal example to highlight the mindset of people who are so hell-bent on achieving their agenda that they don't care who they hurt along the way.

Make no mistake - this outrage over opposition to gay marriage is a symptom of a much greater problem, and that is the dark side of human nature. In the course of history, certain people with certain personality types gravitate to whatever issue they can most beat other people over the head about. These people, in a word, are the Control Freaks.

The Control Freaks transcend gender, race, and sexual orientation. They transcend party affiliation or political labels. (Remember the Dixie Chicks record burning?)

And the worst part of it all: The Control Freaks are currently running China, the E.U., and America right now.

The same mindset that leads a bleeding heart to want to destroy someone's life in the pursuit of their grand vision is the same mindset that leads to destruction on a world scale. The whole reason we are in this mess in the Ukraine is because Control Freaks in the West decided they needed to put in a soft puppet more friendly to their side. In response, the Control Freaks in Russia are now putting their chess pieces into place to wrest power back.

Waiting in the wings is the grandfather of all control freak countries, China, the remaining Communist superpower that is just biding its time until it calmly collects its chips.

China, by the way, is planning on launching satellites to watch over the entire planet. If you think the NSA was bad, just wait until China gets its fat, grubby hands on the planetary steering wheel. As much as the idea of a Western New World Order scares me, the idea of the ruthless Chinese Communists running everything scares me more.

So here's one of the big problems with agenda-driven Control Freaks - besides the fact that they tend to be insufferable and annoying - they always push too hard. They get so caught up in their lust for power and domination, and they are so convinced they are right, that they think they can just steamroll over everybody without consequence.

Watch carefully and see how things play out in the gay rights culture wars. We've got a number of scenarios that might develop, if the intensity of the blacklisting and thought control keeps ramping up:

Scenario 1: The "Gaystapo" literally become that, and are given power by the government to enforce "proper" beliefs about homosexuality. Religious freedom is suppressed, free speech is curtailed, and in the most extreme nightmare scenario, people will be jailed or sent to re-education camps for not complying.

Hey, now that science is figuring out how to read people's minds, maybe they will start institutionalizing you for thinking the wrong things!

If you think this is far-fetched, then I urge you to look at the results of the "hate speech" laws in Europe. A pastor cannot preach against homosexuality without threat of arrest (and some have been jailed).

Scenario 2: Possibly in concert with Scenario 1, people end up getting tired of being pushed around and start fighting back. The backlash at its worst could end up being quite violent and nasty, and any of the "gains" made by the gay rights movement will be rolled back or nullified. Expect to see an increase in violence against gay people, more discrimination against gays, and more anti-homosexual laws in countries.

This is already happening, not just with Russia's new laws against homosexual "propaganda" but in more draconian laws in other countries. In America, gay bashing incidents have been apparently on the upswing - but not by whites in Southern states, by minorities in New York City.

(Here's what I find ironic: Gay marriage is mostly a white liberal issue. They think that when enough white conservatives "die out" they will win. Except, white liberals keep working to bring in more Hispanic immigrants, who tend to be much more socially conservative. This is why Proposition 8 passed in the first place! Doh!)

Ultimately, I find the tactic of the gay rights extremists to be in the long run extremely self-defeating. It only creates more ill will and anger. You know it's getting to be bad when even outspoken gay columnist Andrew Sullivan takes them to task for their excessive behavior.

But that won't matter to the agenda-driven person. That type of person never seems to get the message. They just double down.

So, it is perhaps not a surprise that this same suicidal, destructive arrogance is now controlling our so-called leaders.

Do they really think it is a good idea to keep poking at Russia? Do they honestly think that if they get the World War they seem to so desperately want, that they will come out on top? Have they not figured out that China pretty much owns America (due to all our debt)?

But hey, we Americans will let them continue on with their suicide course, because we are too busy getting up in arms over the personal beliefs of the Firefox guy who created JavaScript. (But hey, we need our JavaScript so we'll keep using that, won't we?)

So while the Gaystapo is busy bullying everyone in sight, the elite are free to go ahead and lie and cheat and pillage. Eventually things are going to blow up in everyone's face if we don't get our priorities straight (no pun intended). If China ends up owning us, and positive depictions of homosexuals are erased from the controlled media (like they are now in China), don't say I didn't warn you.

Stephanie blogs sporadically at a number of websites, including Freeople and Free Thinking Christianity.

About the Author

  167 Comments

  Refresh
Apr 7, 2014 - 1:01am

@Bugzy - the answer is simple

You wrote: "There is clearly a conflict here. Was this man, in his position, acting for the benefit of the shareholders. Mozzilla does require external funding?"

This is actually quite simple. The man's personal religious beliefs are not allowed to be considered in regards to hiring or firing per the Civil Rights Act. As long as he upholds the company culture, his personal religious beliefs or activities have no bearing on his position and the board is not allowed to fire him based on those religious beliefs or activities.

Now, if he tried to use his religious beliefs to implement discrimination of gay people at Mozilla, then they'd have a right to fire him over that. But he was clearly not doing that whatsoever.

Apr 7, 2014 - 12:57am

@Les Baux - you still can't fire a CEO over his religion

What's all this talk about voting? As if a public company with shareholders were the equivalent of voting for a politician at the ballot box. Do you even know how companies work? Shareholders elect the company's Board of Directors, which does the hiring and firing. The shareholders aren't directly engaged in personnel decisions other than that. The Board of Directors is still bound by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

All your talk of voting is nonsense. That has nothing to do with a CEO getting ousted from his job!!

Your circular logic and justification of your totalitarianism is stunning to behold.

The bottom line is, whether you like it or not, companies cannot FIRE someone for their religion in America, PERIOD. It is against the law. END OF STORY.

Bugzy
Apr 7, 2014 - 12:55am

The issue

A company has a legal responsibility to the shareholders. If they believe that a CEO is acting in a way which may damage the bottom line then are they not duty bound to vote that CEO out?

Yet on the other hand we have freedom of expression and belief etc.

There is clearly a conflict here. Was this man, in his position, acting for the benefit of the shareholders. Mozzilla does require external funding?

Money V the rights of the individual.

Public opinion driven by media....

Does media dictate company profits via public opinion?

Just thinking out loud.

Les Baux
Apr 7, 2014 - 12:45am

@stephanie

You cannot discriminate against Muslims, and in Islamic countries gays are regularly beheaded and women stoned for adultery...and young girls married off (and raped by their "husbands") before the age of 10. So no, you cannot fire the Muslim as CEO simply for being a Muslim simply because you don't like some practices or beliefs of Islam.

So you would vote for someone who believes in beheading gays and stoning and raping women? That's something you have to square with, I guess. I'm embarrassed for you. I wouldn't vote against Eich because he is Christian (is he? I have no idea, which sort of illustrates my point). I would vote against him for advocating denying gays the right to marry. Equivalently, I wouldn't vote against someone for being Muslim, but I would vote against them for believing that the penalty for apostasy should be death.

Someone can belong to a religion and simply reject the barbaric parts. Good for them, and I'll certainly consider voting for them. When they don't reject those parts, I got beefs, and the civil rights act doesn't remotely protect them.

You believe one way, someone else believes another way. You want to impose your beliefs on that other person by punishing them for not believing as you do. This makes you totalitarian and intolerant.

Not sure about totalitarian, but I am absolutely intolerant. I am intolerant of the belief that children should be raped, I am intolerant of the belief that apostates should be killed, and, yes, I am intolerant of the belief that homosexuals should not be permitted to marry. It is an intolerance that I embrace willingly and enthusiastically.

flyinkel
Apr 7, 2014 - 12:45am

Deleted

It was only humorous for a minute, if that.

Les Baux
Apr 7, 2014 - 12:36am

@Dagney

Sigh....

When has government protected rights or ever been the solution to anything in history? N-E-V-E-R.

Just read your own damned question. When has government protected rights? I gave an trivial example. I ignored the part after the 'or' because that's what a fucking 'or' allows you to do. Satisfy one half of a logical conjunction, and you have satisfied the statement.

Oops, sorry, you pointed out that I don't come from a scientific background so I wouldn't know anything about that, would I? FWIW, I would bet everything I have my scientific bona fides beat the shit out of yours.

Key Economic Events Week of 8/10

8/10 10:00 ET Job openings
8/11 8:30 ET Producer Price Idx
8/12 8:30 ET Consumer Price Idx
8/13 8:30 ET Initial jobless claims
8/13 8:30 ET Import Price Idx
8/14 8:30 ET Retail Sales
8/14 8:30 ET Productivity & Unit Labor Costs
8/14 8:30 ET Cap Ute and Ind Prod
8/14 10:00 ET Business Inventories

Apr 7, 2014 - 12:33am

@Les Baux - way to bring up a straw man

Seriously? You wrote: "So according to you, if it's my religious belief that all children should be ritually raped and beheaded at age 6, it is illegal for anyone to allow that to influence their decision on whether to vote for me as congressman or CEO?"

You cannot discriminate against Muslims, and in Islamic countries gays are regularly beheaded and women stoned for adultery...and young girls married off (and raped by their "husbands") before the age of 10. So no, you cannot fire the Muslim as CEO simply for being a Muslim simply because you don't like some practices or beliefs of Islam.

Politicians are different and not covered by the Civil Rights Act.

At any rate, believing in traditional marriage is by no means the same thing as advocating rape of children. It is absolutely ridiculous that you would even claim to make that comparison. It is simply your belief that "traditional marriage" between a man and a woman is wrong, but that is just your belief.

There is no "objective" proof to either side because marriage is entirely a societal construct (unless you subscribe to the idea that is a sacrament from God). If anything, a purely scientific and evolutionary view would actually favor traditional marriage, as that union produces children naturally - that's just pure biology. The only reason sex exists at all in nature is to produce offspring. Period.

You believe one way, someone else believes another way. You want to impose your beliefs on that other person by punishing them for not believing as you do. This makes you totalitarian and intolerant.

Dagney Taggart
Apr 7, 2014 - 12:32am

@Baux

Stop putting words in Stephanie's mouth you disingenuous bitch. Read her description of Libertarian again and tell her if you honestly believe what you just said.

I resort to name-calling when the stupid becomes deafening.

Dagney Taggart
Apr 7, 2014 - 12:27am

@Baux

Yet people still get raped, murdered, and molested every day. Why? Because government has not solved the problem. And they have never solved any problem.

I feel stupid for reminding you what it means to solve a problem. You do not come from a scientific background or profession, do you?

Les Baux
Apr 7, 2014 - 12:18am

Awesome link - where does it say religious belief?

So according to you, if it's my religious belief that all children should be ritually raped and beheaded at age 6, it is illegal for anyone to allow that to influence their decision on whether to vote for me as congressman or CEO?

What a bizarre world you live in.

Subscribe or login to read all comments.

Contribute

Donate Shop

Get Your Subscriber Benefits

Private iTunes feed for all TF Metals Report podcasts, and access to Vault member forum discussions!

Key Economic Events Week of 8/10

8/10 10:00 ET Job openings
8/11 8:30 ET Producer Price Idx
8/12 8:30 ET Consumer Price Idx
8/13 8:30 ET Initial jobless claims
8/13 8:30 ET Import Price Idx
8/14 8:30 ET Retail Sales
8/14 8:30 ET Productivity & Unit Labor Costs
8/14 8:30 ET Cap Ute and Ind Prod
8/14 10:00 ET Business Inventories

Key Economic Events Week of 8/3

8/3 9:45 ET Markit Manu PMI July
8/3 10:00 ET ISM Manu PMI July
8/3 10:00 ET Construction Spending
8/4 10:00 ET Factory Orders
8/5 8:15 ET ADP employment July
8/5 9:45 ET Markit Service PMI
8/5 10:00 ET ISM Service PMI
8/6 8:30 ET Initial jobless claims
8/7 8:30 ET BLSBS for July
8/7 10:00 ET Wholesale Inventories

Key Economic Events Week of 7/27

7/27 8:30 ET Durable Goods
7/28 9:00 ET Case-Shiller home prices
7/29 8:30 ET Advance trade in goods
7/29 2:00 ET FOMC Fedlines
7/29 2:30 ET CGP presser
7/30 8:30 ET Q2 GDP first guess
7/31 8:30 ET Personal Income and Spending
7/31 8:30 ET Core inflation
7/31 9:45 ET Chicago PMI

Key Economic Events Week of 7/20

7/21 8:30 ET Chicago Fed
7/21 2:00 ET Senate vote on Judy Shelton
7/22 10:00 ET Existing home sales
7/23 8:30 ET Jobless claims
7/23 10:00 ET Leading Economic Indicators
7/24 9:45 ET Markit flash PMIs for July

Key Economic Events Week of 7/13

7/13 11:30 ET Goon Williams speech
7/13 1:00 ET Goon Kaplan speech
7/14 8:30 ET CPI for June
7/14 2:30 ET Goon Bullard speech
7/15 8:30 ET Empire State and Import Price Idx
7/15 9:15 ET Cap Ute and Ind Prod
7/16 8:30 ET Retail Sales and Philly Fed
7/16 11:00 ET Goon Williams again
7/17 8:30 ET Housing Starts and Permits

Key Economic Events Week of 7/6

7/6 9:45 ET Markit Service PMI
7/6 10:00 ET ISM Service PMI
7/7 10:00 ET Job openings
7/9 8:30 ET Initial jobless claims
7/9 10:00 ET Wholesale inventories
7/10 8:30 ET PPI for June

Key Economic Events Week of 6/29

6/30 9:00 ET Case-Shiller home prices
6/30 9:45 ET Chicago PMI
6/30 10:00 ET Consumer Confidence
6/30 12:30 ET CGP and SSHW to Capitol Hill
7/1 8:15 ET ADP Employment
7/1 9:45 ET Markit Manu PMI
7/1 10:00 ET ISM Manu PMI
7/1 2:00 ET June FOMC minutes
7/2 8:30 ET BLSBS
7/2 10:00 ET Factory Orders

Key Economic Events Week of 6/22

6/22 8:30 ET Chicago Fed
6/22 10:00 ET Existing home sales
6/23 9:45 ET Markit flash PMIs for June
6/23 10:00 ET New home sales
6/25 8:30 ET Q1 GDP final guess
6/25 8:30 ET Durable Goods
6/26 8:30 ET Pers Inc and Spending
6/26 8:30 ET Core inflation

Key Economic Events Week of 6/15

6/16 8:30 ET Retail Sales
6/16 8:30 ET Cap Ute and Ind Prod
6/16 10:00 ET Chief Goon Powell US Senate
6/16 4:00 pm ET Goon Chlamydia speech
6/17 8:30 ET Housing Starts
6/17 12:00 ET Chief Goon Powell US House
6/18 8:30 ET Initial Jobless Claims
6/18 8:30 ET Philly Fed
6/19 8:30 ET Current Account Deficit
6/19 1:00 pm ET CGP and Mester conference

Key Economic Events Week of 6/8

6/9 10:00 ET Job openings
6/9 10:00 ET Wholesale inventories
6/10 8:30 ET CPI for May
6/10 2:00 ET FOMC Fedlines
6/10 2:30 ET CGP presser
6/11 8:30 ET Initial jobless claims
6/11 8:30 ET PPI for May
6/12 8:30 ET Import price index
6/12 10:00 ET Consumer sentiment

Recent Comments

by Ben Stackin, 8 min 44 sec ago
by RangeRider49, 10 min 13 sec ago
by Silvio's Zipper, 17 min 42 sec ago
by bruinjoe, 18 min 3 sec ago
randomness