More Deception at The Comex

Thu, Oct 24, 2013 - 11:25am

This latest move is so brazen in its audacity, even I am stunned. But, since no one else is talking about it, maybe I'm just crazy. Let me lay it out for you and you can decide for yourself.

OK, before we get started, we'd better go back and cover the basics.

The Comex is a futures exchange that does, occasionally, make physical deliveries. To provide for these deliveries, five banks maintain depository vaults in New York. Updates on the daily changes to the amount of metal in these vaults is provided by The CME Group, which owns The Comex, and can be found here:

Within these vaults, metal is delegated to two categories, eligible and registered.

  • Eligible metal is metal being vaulted at the bank warehouse but NOT eligible to be used in the delivery process.
  • Registered metal is metal that is recognized by the CME as available for good delivery against futures contracts.
  • I went searching for a concise explanation of the eligible/registered process and, in the short time I had this morning, the best article I found comes from BullionVault. The article was meant to downplay the significance of declining Comex stocks. Many folks, myself included, would disagree with the author's conclusion. Regardless, that's a topic for another day. In this instance, what's helpful is the background info the author provides. The full link is here but please read through the C&P below:

    First question: How does gold get into warehouse stocks of the futures exchange? Although it's a lengthy process, the answer is actually quite simple. Gold is recovered either from mine output or scrap jewelry and other products, such as bars and coins, at a refinery. The refiner then produces gold bars to the standard and specification of the exchange, in this case the CME Group.
    These gold bars belong either to the refiners themselves, meaning they have bought and own the gold. Or they belong to the refiner's customers, who bought and owned the gold at the refinery, hiring it to make that metal into saleable bars.
    Now, for this particular refinery to deliver metal onto the commodities exchange, it must be a registered acceptable brand, such as Heraeus, Johnson Matthey or Metalor Technologies to name a few.
    Once these gold bars are produced, the metal must then be transported to the warehouse by exchange-approved carriers such as Brinks Inc., Via Mat International or IBI Armored Inc. There is no other way for the gold to get onto the exchange. Gold may move between Comex-approved warehouses, such as those operated by HSBC Bank, Brinks Inc., and Scotia Mocatta Depository. But any moves made between these warehouses must be made using the same approved carriers. No gold can enter the marketplace from outside of this refining loop.

    Once gold is removed from an exchange-approved warehouse and held somewhere outside of this circle of integrity, there is no way for the CME exchange to guarantee the bar's quality. This means that once a person or investor removes bars from the warehouse, then to return them to the exchange they would need to start at the beginning again. By going through the hands of the gold processor and refiners, this provides guarantee of the standard and quality of the material being delivered on the exchange.

    So with the gold inside the warehouse, second question: When is the gold considered eligible or registered on the commodities exchange?
    Answer: When acceptable bars are brought into an exchange-approved warehouse they become "eligible" for settlement of gold futures contracts traded on the exchange. So at this point, the owner of the bars may deliver them onto the exchange, and warehouse receipts are created. That is when the gold bars become "registered" stocks.

    Eligible gold stocks may or may not ever become registered stocks. Why? Because the warehouse is still a warehouse and the owner may simply want to vault their metal securely, before using it to meet demand elsewhere – for manufacturing, or from investors in another marketplace, such as Asia. This eligible gold may belong to an investor, a refiner, a hedge fund, a bank or producer. Many times these people are holding the metal for their end customers. And it may move at any time, and is much more flexible than the warehouse receipts that are registered stocks.
    The CME, the exchange, does not have any direct control over nor interest in the size of eligible stocks. Registered stocks however are officially recognized by the CME for good delivery on the exchange. That means that this inventory exists and is set aside to make delivery against gold futures contracts. Traders who stand for delivery, rather than cash payment, when their contract settles take delivery of the warehouse receipt. This does not change the quantity of registered stocks inside the warehouse. It remains registered, but the receipt changes ownership.
    If a gold futures buyer wants to take physical delivery of the gold and "break" the receipt then this is possible. But it is a process and takes time. Once broken, if the gold remains in the exchange circle of integrity – meaning the exchange-approved warehouse – then those bars become eligible stocks. But if the gold bars are removed from the exchange-approved warehouse then they no longer are eligible and are no longer tracked in any way.

    Third question then: How do the warehouse receipts work?
    A warehouse receipt is a bearer instrument much like a check. It can be endorsed from one party to another. The holder of the receipt pays the storage costs. Most times when people take delivery of a warehouse receipt they leave it with their brokers. In some cases people may want to take possession of the warehouse receipt themselves. This is rare, just like with equity or bond certificates; no one actually takes delivery of the documents any longer. But it is still possible for a fee.
    If a person owns a warehouse receipt, the gold that it represents is still in the registered stocks, even if they have taken physical delivery of the document. They can always redeliver these receipts onto the exchange by selling contracts.

    OK, hopefully this all makes sense because now I'm going to present to you the problem. In the article and on the CME website, the notion of paper gold is never addressed. Yes, there are warehouse receipts that some fools willingly accept at delivery, thinking they have a claim to actual gold. BUT...the metal that is "held for storage" in the depositories is assumed to be REAL METAL, held there on behalf of REAL CLIENTS. Registered gold backstops the delivery process of the exchange. Eligible gold may, one day, become registered and ready for delivery. More likely, it is simply being vaulted at the depository for safekeeping. Please take a moment to go back up and re-read the BullionVault piece, paying particular attention to the sentences I've underlined.

    As mentioned above, each afternoon the CME Group issues a "Gold Stocks" and "Silver Stocks" report. Some typical reports are posted below. Note how some days there is minimal activity and some days have significant activity. However, note the attention to detail. All bars are assayed and weighed to within thousandths of an ounce.

    First, let's study the report from October 8, 2013. Click on it to enlarge it and notice that vault movements are all measured in thousandths of a troy ounce. For example, on this day Brinks received into their registered vault 1,699.940 troy ounces and JPMorgan saw 708.704 ounces removed from their eligible vault.

    Below are two other reports, dated 9/30/13 and 10/17/13. Again, note the precision of the measurements as great caution is apparently taken to ensure that the metal is properly logged and accounted for.

    So, now, here's where the fun starts. Back on Friday, we noted an unusually large addition to the JPMorgan eligible vault. The sheer size of it caught my eye and you can see it on the report below. Note the other reported vault movements that day and then see if anything about the JPM data catches your eye.

    Hmmmm....While HSBC and Scotia posted the usual moves in thousandths of an ounce, the JPM eligible addition is a flat, round number. Not only that, the round number in question is 192,900.000 troy ounces. What is so significant about that number? Well, the generally-accepted number of ounces in a metric ton is 32,150. If you multiply that number by six, you get 192,900. So, last Friday, JPMorgan booked into their eligible account exactly and precisely six metric tonnes of gold. Now, maybe by some magical occurrence they weighed and assayed each bar and the total amazingly came to 192,900.000 but to me that seems statistically improbable. But with no access to the vaults we're left with simply taking their word for it.

    Imagine my disgust shock when I saw the next gold stocks report on Monday. Not only did JPMorgan magically book in another precise and round number, the actual increase in eligible gold was reported as 96,450.000 ounces. You're probably pretty good with math so I imagine you've already figured out that that is precisely three metric tonnes. Willing (forced) to give JPM the benefit of the doubt on Friday, we can no longer do so here. EXACTLY SIX METRIC TONNES ON FRIDAY. EXACTLY THREE METRIC TONNES ON MONDAY.

    And then we get to yesterday. After a non-event, empty report on Tuesday, what do you think we saw yesterday? Could JPMorgan have the audacity to report another round number multiple of one metric ton? Nope. They simply reported one metric ton! Again, nothing to the right of the decimal point. Just 32,150.000 troy ounces, exact and on the nose.

    So what do we make to of this? We're supposed to believe that, over the last four days, JPMorgan has brought in EXACTLY 10 metric tonnes of gold into their eligible account. In precise and detailed fashion, this massive deposit of gold from a customer(s) measured out to be exactly 321,500.000 troy ounces. RRRrrrrright.....Only the most ardent Cartel apologist and disinfo agent would be willing to swallow that one.

    Here's what I think is going on:

    • The deposits are bullshit. Either completely fabricated and falsified OR simple paper claims. It's one or the other due to the simple statistical improbability of three consecutive round numbers totaling exactly 10 metric tonnes.
    • Recall that back in 2007, Morgan Stanley paid $4.4MM to customers to settle a lawsuit brought by customers who had been charged storage fees on paper metal.
    • Is JPMorgan pulling the same trick now? Given the laundry list of their other fines since 2011, I wouldn't put it past them.
    • If this isn't another JPM client-screwjy awaiting a lawsuit, then The Comex and, by extension The CME Group, is allowing JPMorgan to fraudulently goose their warehouse stocks ahead of the all-important December delivery period to give a false impression of solvency. The World Gold Council-owned BullionVault may not think that the lowest stocks since 2005 is a big deal but plenty of other folks due, most notably Jesse. He's been diligently tracking the daily changes for months. Click this latest update and be sure to review the charts:
    • Lastly, the brazenness of the operation must be noted. No effort is made to conceal it. The CME Group simply reports the statistically-outrageous numbers and no one notices or cares. We're just supposed to believe that JPMorgan's eligible vault can nearly double in size in just over two weeks and that's all fine, dandy and business as usual.

    Well, it's NOT business as usual. The extraordinary and counter-intuitive price raids, the massive depletion of the GLD, persistent backwardation in the GOFO rates and JPMorgan's cornering, 70,000-contract, NET LONG gold futures position all warn you that we are in uncharted territory and major changes are afoot. This eligible gold deception currently being employed by The Comex is just another indicator.

    By the looks of it, the end of the fractional reserve bullion banking system is rapidly approaching. Keep stacking and prepare accordingly.


    November 4 UPDATE:

    In the past week, much has been made that the opinions stated above could be somehow construed as fact. Though I clearly began this piece with the disclaimer of "decide for yourself", some still seem to think this post needs a counter-argument. Since all of the Comex data is deliberately opaque and, in the words of The CME itself "not reliable", I figured I might as well give some attention to an alternate theory first supposed by Bron Suckeki of the Perth Mint.

    Bron thinks that the entire 10 mts of eligible stock can be easily attributed to 1-kg bars. OK, who knows? Maybe he's right. His primary points are below:

    TF, which of these do you think are facts and which are opinions one could be right or wrong about:
    1. Comex rules allow for 1kg bars
    2. A 1kg bar weighs 32.15oz
    3. 32.15 x 6000 = 192900
    4. 192900 is therefore not statistically impossible

    I'm not looking for an apology, but I think given the above facts, your original post requires a note to inform future readers that while you think Comex stocks are "bullshit", the round 192900 figure is possible and can't be used to prove the stocks are "bullshit".

    So, anyway, there you have it. An alternate theory. Take it or leave it and, as originally stated, decide for yourself.


    About the Author

    tfmetalsreport [at] gmail [dot] com ()


    Bron SucheckiHeirHelmut
    Oct 25, 2013 - 8:51pm


    Generally bars will be re-refined or tested/assayed, but it depends on how it is coming back in. If it is coming back from a person you've never dealt with before who can't provide any history of where it came from, then yes it will be re-refined. If it is someone you have dealt with before and it has been vaulted with a known operator, then weighing and visual inspect may be sufficient. As the entity taking it is will be held accountable and will lose their accreditation (and be effectively shut out of the market) if they introduce bad bars into the system, they err on the side of caution.

    Perth Mint doesn't trade any futures market, so I'm not an expert on the detailed operation of that market. I would think it is possible for several owners to hold part of a bar, for example the ETF IAU I believe did hold some of the metal backing its ETF in a COMEX warehouse. However I think arrangements would only be for eligible metal. Once a bar is registered, then the warehouse receipt is issued in the name of only one person I would suspect.

    My understanding is that if total COMEX inventory is changing then it means it has to moving out of the warehouses. The point of eligible as I understand it is, while it is not registered and thus set aside for delivery against a contract, for market transparency the CME requires any 100oz or 1kg metal in a COMEX warehouse to be reported so that the market is fully informed as to the stocks potentially available to the market. This is to avoid games where a long could just de-register bars and then the metal "disappears" making stocks lower and thus hoping to make people think there is a shortage when in fact the bars are still in the vault.

    That is of some use but Martin Armstrong tells the story of the Buffer silver and how it was shipped to London (whos stocks are not reported) to give the impression of a stock shortage. So the requirement to report eligible stocks does make it harder/costly to manipulate on the long side, although I would not consider it much of a deterrent given the small cost of shipment.

    Oct 25, 2013 - 1:17pm

    @ TF RE: wussification

    Say Turd....

    Just by chance I ran across this:

    Apparently the story you linked to may be false.

    Oh, that tricky internet...

    Oct 25, 2013 - 12:31pm


    Funny,was just reading about the benefits of coriander in a herb book yesterday,good for the digestive system too

    HappyNowwooden nickel
    Oct 25, 2013 - 12:07pm

    wooden nickel.  No I wasn't

    wooden nickel. No I wasn't being sarcastic. I do realize that one person has a lot more power and influence than the other.

    Within the boundaries of this site however Andrew Maguire is an important figure and may influence us more than Obama who is frequently discounted.

    Oct 25, 2013 - 11:12am

    Getting your money out of banks


    I feel this is an extremely important and timely topic that needs concentrated discussion within Turdland.

    Would you please start a dedicated thread discussing options on where to keep your fiat other than the banks?

    Thank You!

    pontiacSpartacus Rex
    Oct 25, 2013 - 11:11am

    Switzerland's gold exports

    The chart from Koos Jansen showing gold exports greatly increasing over the last 12 years has another interesting artifact. Over that same period it shows that imports were over 6 thousand tons higher than exports. Somebody is storing lots of gold in Swizerland.

    Key Economic Events Week of 5/10

    5/11 10:00 ET JOLTS job openings
    5/11 12:00 ET Goon Brainard
    5/12 8:30 ET Consumer Price Index
    5/12 9:00 ET Goon Chlamydia
    5/12 2:00 ET Federal Budget
    5/13 8:30 ET Producer Price Index
    5/14 8:30 ET Retail Sales
    5/14 8:30 ET Import Price Index
    5/14 9:15 ET Cap Ute & Ind Prod
    5/14 10:00 ET Consumer Sentiment

    Green Lantern
    Oct 25, 2013 - 10:19am

    This all plays like good

    This all plays like good political theater. He is not who he says he is because his wife says so. I am who I say I am because I say so. Neither makes for a convincing case no matter how lucid an argument. For a couple hundred bucks, somebody can pull anybodies entire history, credit record, employment history including the individual in question. Every private investigator, banker, investigative journalist can access this information legally.

    But at the end of the day what does it matter? AM not Obama. Does anybody need AM's testimony to know that JPMorque manipulates markets? 13 billion in fines. Libor. Does anybody need his testimony to realize the corruption that infiltrates the entire matrix? And does it make ONE IOTA of a difference on the effect of the long term trend?

    Has anybody read Schumpeter, free market analysis? Has anybody read Dewey? Has anybody read Babylon Banksters on the history of banking? Has anybody read the case histories of all the long term effect of corruption, manipulation of entire economies on currencies, systems, stock markets and even currencies. Volatility is caused by manipulation but not the cycle. Nobody can make that case. After reading and studying all the above, I have seen no strong counter analysis that manipulation can deter the current cycle. There are some events that could but I haven't seen them mentioned. I know some of you believe the system has to blow up first but nobody can make a case for it that really sticks.

    AM who he says he is? Doesn't matter. It's a distraction. Whistle blowers have a very poor history of being effectual at massive change and the #1`rule of whistle blowing is that they become the target and their information never creates effectual changes. This is what the research indicates which I've published before. My working assumption is that all the regulatory agencies are ineffectual and corrupt. Ok now what?

    Focus on the real drivers and the dynamics of the markets which includes manipulation.

    If you want to drive from Boston to Washington DC and somebody doesn't want you to get there. They might put bumps all along the road. Your car careen up and down creating a very volatile ride. Might even send you into the next lane, but it can't deviate you from the destination. An earthquake can, closing of the highway due to a disaster, but no matter of impediments alters the route.

    wooden nickel
    Oct 25, 2013 - 9:50am


    you're joking right? i missed the sarcasm tag. uh, no, i didn't apply the "same yardstick". one was running for the highest public office in the country, the other is a pm trader. so, i scrutinized obama's "credentials" a wee bit more than AM's credentials. alas, i found out the guy presently in the oval office, fake birth certificate or no, is an empty suit with a deep voice and nice smile.

    Oct 25, 2013 - 9:10am


    can help the body eliminate heavy metals

    don't forget milk thistle

    and check out Ashwandha

    Oct 25, 2013 - 8:27am

    I didn't get caught up in

    I didn't get caught up in whether there was something screwy about Obama's birth certificate and the same applies to Maguire's credentials. Expect you are all applying the same yardstick as well, right?

    Subscribe or login to read all comments.

    Become member and subscribe to Turd's Vault


    Donate Shop

    Get Your Subscriber Benefits

    Private iTunes feed for all TF Metals Report podcasts, and access to Vault member forum discussions!

    Key Economic Events Week of 5/10

    5/11 10:00 ET JOLTS job openings
    5/11 12:00 ET Goon Brainard
    5/12 8:30 ET Consumer Price Index
    5/12 9:00 ET Goon Chlamydia
    5/12 2:00 ET Federal Budget
    5/13 8:30 ET Producer Price Index
    5/14 8:30 ET Retail Sales
    5/14 8:30 ET Import Price Index
    5/14 9:15 ET Cap Ute & Ind Prod
    5/14 10:00 ET Consumer Sentiment

    Recent Comments

    by JohnnyArrowmaker, 5 min 42 sec ago
    by Connie, 31 min 44 sec ago
    by Marcus, 34 min 55 sec ago
    by surfeitndearth, 53 min 43 sec ago
    by silverseeker, 55 min 37 sec ago

    Forum Discussion

    by 11IMIX, 2 hours 17 min ago
    by Sovereign, 3 hours 18 min ago
    by Green Lantern, 11 hours 21 min ago
    by Green Lantern, May 9, 2021 - 5:55pm