Two Tribes

Mon, Aug 5, 2013 - 8:32pm

An experience I had about six months ago left a profound impression on me, so much so that I find myself mentally referencing it whenever discussions arise regarding government spending and debt, or the end of the Keynsian experiment. It would not be an exaggeration to say that this experience shocked me in some ways, not because it invalidated opinions I previously held but because it made clear to me how much I had underestimated certain elemental forces at work and the cultural attitudes behind them. This essay is about the implications of that experience. I have no doubt that some will be offended by what I write here, and for that I am genuinely sorry as offending you is certainly not my goal. I can only state that what you are about to read is as completely accurate a description of the events as I can possibly relate- and I promise you that what I say happened actually happened.

In my work, I brushed up against a situation where two completely opposing worldviews were clashing. Their cultural assumptions and opinions could not possibly have been farther apart, and the animosity I witnessed was both deep-seated and raw. These groups were, in essence, two completely different tribes and I had an inside view of this clash because two people directly precipitating it thought – erroneously as it turned out – that I was a member of their tribe and treated me accordingly, giving me an insider’s tour of the conflict and situation with no holds barred.

The situation I was called in to consult on was as follows: There was an interesting property located in a rural township. The owner wanted to sell this property to the township with the idea that they would develop it for community use, and given its location this was an intriguing idea. However, because the site contained certain features that are given protection under law, two Government workers with expertise in these features became interested in the property and began working on obtaining funding so the township could acquire the tract. After discussing the possibility of purchasing and developing the property for community use with a few interested members of the Township Board of Supervisors, the Government employees did what they do in their professional arena. They went out and successfully obtained a sizeable grant from the state. With a chunk of free money in hand, they returned to the township believing that nothing stood in the way of the project moving forward as they envisioned… except for one tiny detail.

The full township board had not been notified that this money was coming in, and had not been consulted- nor had any official vote taken place. This presented a problem because the majority of the board, being elected in a rural area on a platform of fiscal responsibility, had not approved the plan. Indeed, there was no actual plan, no estimate of total costs, nothing. These supervisors pointed out that 1. The “free” money, while a considerable sum, was not enough to pay for the entire project and thus the township would be obligated to come up with the remainder, 2. There had been no accounting of future costs associated with the maintenance, staffing, equipment, etc that would be needed to maintain and operate the facility, so they had no idea what these costs would add to the budget in the future, and 3. The Township budget was balanced at the moment and thus the services they currently provided were sustainable at present levels indefinitely, but this meant that the budget was therefore already maxed-out absent new revenue. These people had been elected on a platform of no new taxes, thus when these elected representatives actually had a chance to vote on the project, they voted no. At this point, I was brought in by the Government men to consult on certain aspects of it, to see if I wanted to get involved in doing a study on the property.

All this is boring stuff, so far… but the tour I was given that day was truly remarkable. The Government men assumed that I was one of them- a “member of their tribe” because of my profession and current position. Because of this assumption, they spent all day telling me what they really thought. It was an education.

The Government men were in equal turns angry and astounded that their generosity in obtaining all of that ‘free’ state money for the township was so unappreciated. I was informed that it was only the pathetic ignorance and small-mindedness of the rural culture that had kept the project from going forward. In terms of the project, I was told again and again how these people lacked vision and were basically too stupid to accept the big pile of free cash that had been laid at their feet, a rank example of witlessness that the Government men found deeply offensive. The money was there, thanks to their efforts, and the stupid locals were too dumb to simply reach down and pick it up.

The government men referred all day long to the Township Supervisors as “hillbillies”, “hicks”, and on one occasion “Tea-party racists”, despite the fact that they were rural farm owners (in an area where the average farm is worth 1-2 million) and local businessmen/women, and despite the absence of any actual racial incidents of any kind. Though these people lived far from the isolated ‘hollers’ of Appalachia, and were successful business and farm owners in their community, I must have heard the term “hillbilly” forty or fifty times, interspersed with jokes about marrying cousins and inbreeding. One local supervisor was in favor of the project, and I was therefore told that “she was OK- must be the only one who has all her teeth, heh heh!”, as if all the rest of these community representatives were stump-toothed inbreds straight from “Deliverance”. Though it is entirely possible I have led a sheltered life, it was nonetheless the most blatantly bigoted conversation I have ever heard in person, leading me to wonder on the drive home if this was what it was like to talk to unapologetic bigots back during the 30’s or 40’s, merely substituting “Hillbilly” and “Inbred” for what would in a previous era have been “Darkie” or “Jew”.

It was crystal clear that these men were very comfortable speaking this way and that, indeed, this was likely how they and their co-workers in government usually talked, so easily did these slurs and aspersions flow during otherwise normal, professional conversation. In their tribe, it was apparently perfectly acceptable to characterize the other tribe in these terms. I was truly amazed at the depth of sheer disgust expressed.

At one point during the proceedings I was talking shop with one of them and he informed me that the new Governor’s budget cuts had necessitated a drastic change in how he oversaw certain state contracts which he supervises. According to state law, a specific type of survey was required prior to certain public projects, and after this survey was completed a report had to be submitted to the state. Previously, he sent these out on a contract basis to big companies to the tune of 50k per project, but with the new budget cuts, he informed me sadly that he was now farming the work out to a local state college, which could handle them at a cost of around 5 thousand per job. “How is the quality” I asked? He assured me that it was great, just as good as the big boys. Now I happen to know that around 20 of these surveys are done annually in my part of the state alone, and that this represents less than 1/4th of the total done statewide per year. I sat there (pretending to pay attention while doing the math) and trying to wrap my head around the fact that this guy basically just told me that he used to pay 4 million per year in state money to do these things, but when push came to shove he could do the exact same thing for just 500k. Given that this guy has worked in his current job for over a decade, I would guess conservatively that his casual little lunch admission means that on this type of project alone he personally has spent at least 40 million taxpayer dollars for projects he could have completed for 5 million over the last decade. He then went back to telling me how ignorant the local tea party was, and never missed a beat. It was a clarifying experience.

* * *

When I read of IRS employees targeting groups advocating for small government, using the extraordinary power of the government’s ability to tax in order to purposefully harass and target these groups in a direct effort to hamper their political activity and speech, I am not surprised in the least. They do not view these groups as ‘fellow citizens deserving of constitutionally protected rights", they view them as members of a different and profoundly inferior tribe, a tribe so debased and low that it is only right to treat them with disdain and to use whatever force is available to thwart their goals. When I read of the wailing and the dire predictions of disaster that would be caused by the small, virtually inconsequential sequester cuts made in the face of exponentially mounting Federal deficits, I am not surprised in the least. Those dollars are largely fictional to the tribe that spends them ‘on behalf of others’; the money is merely an abstraction representing to them departmental power or career advancement more than any actual value that must be earned through productive endeavor.

And you want to know the greatest irony, or perhaps tragedy, of the entire story? The government men who so unapologetically mocked the culture, the reasoning, and even the genetics of the small-government advocates from the township? When we left our meeting that day, those men returned to their offices in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania- the first state capital city to have been so profligate in its spending that it could not pay even the interest on its enormous debts and had declared bankruptcy just months earlier. These men were utterly oblivious to the fact that this rural community they so freely mocked was being run in a way that ensured fiscal survival and continuance, while they returned to taxpayer-funded offices at taxpayer-funded jobs in the first failed capital city in America, a basket-case polity so ill-managed that it can no longer pay for even the basic services required to remain a functioning city. This fact did not stop them from believing themselves to be utterly and completely superior to their small town/small government counterparts in public service. It did not for one second give them pause, or spur them to reason through the consequences of their assumptions of public works and spending in relation to the assumptions of governance they found so provincial and uninformed in the people of the township. The people of the township were, government men believed, members of an ignorant and benighted tribe and thus were entirely deserving of their contempt.

Two tribes. And I have no doubt that one of those tribes will feed without question or remorse upon the carcass of what was once a thriving economy, right up until the last scrap of flesh is devoured and there is nothing left to consume. To even question doing so would be to affirm a critique originating from the other tribe… and that would be unthinkable.

About the Author


Jakarta Expat
Aug 6, 2013 - 2:16am


Pining, A great thought process by you and even a better write up, you should give serious thought to writing a book on a subject you feel passionately about when you have time.

Aug 6, 2013 - 2:21am

To Jim Willie

He says always:"My source told me...."

Can he tell us if his source is just one person?In the bank sector or politics?


Aug 6, 2013 - 3:10am

Jim W

Wasn't there going to be a release of sensitive info on the bankers via wikileaks or similar some time back?

Motley Fool
Aug 6, 2013 - 3:44am

Speaking of tribes

I am reminded of this :

FOA: Looking back, Another was a true master of understanding people's thought processes. He knew that none of us, that's you, me or any of the rest of us raised inside a background of American financial understanding, would ever accept his position thrust; with him just spelling it out in the open. Especially when this whole financial / political transition has been taking place over more than a decade and a half. By the way, he started this some decades ago. So, he decided to ask readers and listeners to think for themselves; by presenting bits and pieces of the flaws in our "Western Thought" as others saw it and as it pertained to his world of gold and oil. Not wanting to prove anything, while asking us to prove everything for ourselves; as these long term events unfolded.

I understand that there are a large group of basic individuals that fully understand our line of what is happening and are buying gold. What I never envisioned was how many groups make up the gold trader crowd; all standing apart from the Physical Gold Advocates. Further, I never thought they would segregate into so many vocal tribes, each trying to advance their own minor position in the gold world and willing to step all over themselves and anyone else in the process. I find it all a real show / play to watch as it truly demonstrates the very human dynamic Western governments have use to distort modern gold thought. I now understand that Another did fully grasp just how distorted this chain of thought was and went around it all by waiting for events to completely destroy their concepts; instead of debating with a host of gold tribes.

In the end, physical gold will win out and prove to be the greatest wealth holding anyone has ever known. Unable to grasp that only a transition of political influence by old world players can break this modern American Western hold on gold, these tribes are vulnerable to the same government influence they long for. Their wealth will be portioned by those same Western governments as world political reality forces our American leaders to embrace a world "free market" in physical gold. While abrogating, thru taxes and windfall appropriations, all forms of paper gold ownership.

Today they chant; " we want our leaders to recognize gold again"! OH, it will all right and the impact such a recognition will have on these various paper gold plays will leave these gold tribes dancing around a midnight fire! (smile) If nothing else, the entertainment of watching them spew brime on each other will be quite an act to follow. If nothing else it will educate future investors as to where to look for reason. Indeed, the law of ages never changes as ones conduct in social interaction still identifies oratory as being worthy or no. People that relish rash interaction always find themselves surrounded by fools. Eventually broke fools! (smile)

Aug 6, 2013 - 3:55am

Open source house plans

If you have the dirt, but not the house, this may be helpful.

Jakarta Expat
Aug 6, 2013 - 4:38am

Another 2 tribes with issues

Just saw this seems it was just reported today, Tuesday August 6 at 3:30PM Jakarta time on the BBC

US orders citizens to leave Yemen

The US State Department has ordered citizens and non-emergency government staff to leave Yemen "immediately" due to security threats.

It comes after the sudden closure of 20 US embassies and consulates on Sunday.

This was prompted by intercepted conversations between two senior al-Qaeda figures, including top leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, US media said.

The US earlier said the closures in North Africa and the Middle East were "out of an abundance of caution".

A number of US diplomatic posts in the region - including in the Yemeni capital Sanaa - will remain closed until Saturday.

A state department global travel alert, issued last week, is also in force until the end of August.

Urban Roman
Aug 6, 2013 - 4:44am


Great post.

Makes me think of Orlov's Reinventing Collapse.

The struggle of the century is going to be over governance -- centralized/authoritarian vs distributed/local. I noticed an early round of that in the Water Wars story back in the 90s. The corrupt government of Bolivia sold water rights to the multinational Bechtel. Actually those water rights were moved several times from one conglomerate to another. The grand theory was that it would bring reliable water supplies to the boonies of Bolivia. But of course, the reality was that now Bechtel was sending the natives a water bill for exactly the same water supplies they already had.

An increasingly familiar story, one that comes in a lot of different flavors these days. Enron was another example -- the way they extracted money from California...

Aug 6, 2013 - 5:14am

A brave new world

DPH was kind enough to post a link to several videos for weekend viewing and I watched the movie A brave new world. The plot was insignificant compared to the presentment of Houxley's vision of the future presented in the movie.

The differences in attitude between the Alphas, the Betas, the Deltas, and the "savages" had me thinking all weekend that there already are Alphas today and they think they deserve their positions and their status just as in the movie. The productive class, which I might be classified as which harbors a work ethic might just be some delta happily doing the grunt work of the Alpha's easy life.

When reading your essay after watching this movie, it seems all to clear that we not only are heading where Aldous Houxley (sp?) foresaw, but that we might have already arrived. Alphas are in government, banking, CEOs and Bildeburgers. Betas are College educated managment, Government carrer types with pensions and benifits. The third class which I can't recall their name are the productive "happy to work" class. And the Deltas are the menial workers.

Jakarta Expat
Aug 6, 2013 - 5:54am

Going once,going twice: a bunch of gold coins left behind by a

Going once, going twice: a bunch of gold coins left behind by a recluse

CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) — The final treasures of a quiet man who collected a fortune in gold coins will be auctioned off Tuesday in Nevada.

The body of Walter Samaszko Jr. was found in his Carson City home in June 2012. After his death, a cleaning crew hired to tidy his modest, ranch style home where he had lived for four decades came upon a stunning discovery — boxes and boxes full of gold coins and bullion collected over an unassuming lifetime. It was enough to fill two wheelbarrows.

Pictures and rest of story here:

Aug 6, 2013 - 7:09am

Royal Cdn Mint

Doing some digging for sales of maples, and came accross the following, which might be of interest. I will continue digging through RCM reports for other goodies.

14.1 Precious metal leases
In order to facilitate the production of precious metal coins and manage the risks associated with changes in metal prices, the Corporation may enter into firm fixed price purchase commitments, as well as precious metals leases. As at March 30, 2013, the Corporation had $73.8 million precious metal purchase commitments outstanding (December 31, 2012 – $63.8 million). At the end of the period, the Corporation had entered into precious metal leases as follows:
Ounces March 30, 2013 December 31, 2012
Gold 6,000 6,000
Silver 2,101,788 2,540,498
Platinum 8,653 5,751

Royal Canadian Mint
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
13 weeks ended March 30, 2013
The fees for these leases are based on market value. The precious metal lease payment expensed for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2013 is $0.8 million (13 weeks ended March 31, 2012 - $3.0 million). The value of the metals under these leases has not been reflected in the Corporation’s condensed consolidated financial statements since the Corporation intends to settle these commitments through receipt or delivery of the underlying metal.

Jakarta Expat
Aug 6, 2013 - 7:27am



I just read on Drudge that the US is bombing Yeman with drones.

Here is a link

Considering tomorrow night is the end of Ramadan and Thursday is the start of the largest Muslim holiday in the Muslim year this is not going to bode well thus more tribal problems.

Aug 6, 2013 - 7:31am

re tribes and Brave New World

I remember a federal election here, and our riding always goes to a prominent Liberal or NDPer, just the way it is when most of your neighbours work for the gummint. I had decided to vote for the Marijuana Party, because I fully agreed, for once in my life, with a political party's platform, this one resting on the solid plank of legalizing a weed. At our karate dojo, we actually had the candidate for the Communist Party training with us, along with his two sons and the lesbian lover of his ex-wife, but here's the funny part: there were two Communist parties running in the same riding ... a Trotskyite party and a Leninist party. Had they been able to cooperate, they would have out polled the stoners. But no, we out polled them and immediately government policy was changed. Or not.

As to Brave New World. A short and good read. Better than the movie, I would add.

And now a chide to Pining - a great post, but I was hoping you would also show prejudice from the other tribe. Those kinds of urban jerks are appalling, but the divide is on both sides, as witnessed by people here using the term "free-shit army", which I find shocking too. Dehumanizing one's opponent, or the person who stands in one's way, is universal.

Aug 6, 2013 - 8:11am

I thought we were we other tribe

Not wanting to spend money we don`t have on stuff we don`t need, dehumanizing aside.

Aug 6, 2013 - 8:12am


The value of the metals under these leases has not been reflected in the Corporation’s condensed consolidated financial statements since the Corporation intends to settle these commitments through receipt or delivery of the underlying metal.

Assuming they minted and sold the metals they leased they would have to either purchase the metal from whoever they leased from or purchase from somewhere else and return that metal to whoever they leased from. Rather than purchase metals outright and take price risk, they borrow (lease) and pay percentage just like any loan. They do this because they do not want to price metals minted until they are ready, especially if they expect the price to be lower.

Aug 6, 2013 - 8:32am

Yes rtabit

That is what it says.

Aug 6, 2013 - 9:19am


I too have underestimated the government class's contempt for us common folk. And what really pisses me off is my wife and I work our asses off and are two of a small group of people who even pays taxes anymore. Just shameful.

Aug 6, 2013 - 10:01am

For Jim Willie

What is his (sources) take on the Vatican getting kicked out of their bank?

And (related?) Why did the usgov close the embassies this weekend?

treefrog J Y
Aug 6, 2013 - 10:02am

turdistan now has a band!

stolen from...

21 Painfully Awkward Band Photos

Urban Roman
Aug 6, 2013 - 10:45am

... if it weren't for bad

... if it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all ...

Aug 6, 2013 - 10:50am

Pining hits close to home

Quite an interesting read. This one is especially so to me since I happen to live in Harrisburg and even work in one of those downtown state government buildings he references- Department of Environmental Protection here. I have heard similar attitudes from some “tribal” coworkers in the office (and from others outside of it), "Pennsyltucky" being the most common term of contempt used to refer to the rural and mountain areas of the state. But I’ve also heard unflattering names and plenty of unpleasant things said about the urban residents as well as the state workers by some locals who don’t work for it. So yes, I believe what he said is true, but to be fair it is only presenting one side of a multi-sided issue, and in my opinion ultimately this tribal attitude is just one of many reflections of the divide and conquer techniques used by the real power players by pitting all these different middle and working class people against each other. Not much different than what you’ll find anywhere in the US between the different races, cultures, religions, political persuasions, etc.

I can also tell you there are pretty much every kind of people working here, everything from ultra-liberal more-government-regulation-is-the-answer-to-all-problems types, to some of those rural hunters and farmers (one woman who sits across from me raises goats just like Katie!), lots of veterans, even a couple libertarians (myself included) and everything in between. Several of us are awake to the issues that are discussed daily on these boards. We're just the pions of state government, not much different than the pions of the corporate world, working 8-4 doing technical and scientific work (ideally) to balance the rights of private industry with the rights of everyone else not to be poisoned by said private industry's pollution. Many of us have good intentions and yet I don't doubt that some get off on power trips and that some of the regulation that comes out of this office goes too far. People are people everywhere you go. The truth of the matter is, in this town as the state capitol, government is pretty much the only major employeer around, and its employees are the primary supporters of the local economy.

As for these tribes, personally I'm not much for tribes or teams, never felt I fit in with any one in particular. I was raised in the rural outskirts of the city myself, spent my childhood playing in the woods and fields around the house, helping Dad chop and stack firewood and garden out back, and shooting BB gun. But I was also exposed to the pervasive urban ghetto culture that thrives in the city and spreads out through the suburbs. It's typically Pennsylvania, everything from rural "hillbilly" farmers and hunters, to typical suburban families, to an abundance of urban street thug homeboys, drug dealers and rejects from the NYC projects who shoot each other up every night, all residing within 10-15 miles of each other. So yes, stereotypes and prejudices abound on all sides.

Pining is dead on about one thing- The city is a hot mess. Bankrupt, corrupt, and crime-ridden with a barely-literate former welfare fraudster as mayor. She's just a useful idiot for the Wall Street firms and their paid-for guys in state government looking out for their interests that are raping the city in its bankrupt state. The plan is to strip the city's of all its assets to cover the massive, unpayable debts that the previous mayor stacked up and to ensure that they plant the losses firmly on the shoulders of the city resident/taxpayer. It's a long story but one which is being played out in different ways across the country, CA Lawyer's descriptions of Stockton come to mind.

Anyway, just thought I’d throw in my 2 mercury dimes on a local topic. Thanks for the post!

benque JML-2012
Aug 6, 2013 - 11:00am


I very much like your post, and the views you expressed. I think you've hit one of the problem nails right square on the head.


Aug 6, 2013 - 11:19am

Speaking of Pennsylvania

I really hope this wasn't the Township in the story...

"It's a surreal nightmare for the township, 75 miles north of Philadelphia. Ross Township is so quiet that it never garnered big headlines before.
"They are never in the newspaper," Monroe County Commissioner Suzanne McCool said. "They are the only township in Monroe County that hasn't had a tax increase in many, many years." -CNN

No tax increase in YEARS? Can't have that, no sirree.


The problem with the gov't officials in the story is merely that they weren't thinking BIG enough. State grant to purchase and develop a property for town use? Pshaw! It's all about SCALE. Here's how to do it:

"In the south of Italy, where most of the wind farm development has taken place, it is thought that mafia clans had a stake in many of the companies involved.
Then, by infiltrating the public agencies that award wind farm contacts and distribute subsidies, they have been able to ensure they win the business.
Experts say the gangs strong-arm landowners into accepting wind farms, which destroy swathes of countryside, and threaten any construction firms that refused to pay extortion fees.
" -- Daily Mail


@MF -- while the segment you quote DOES mention tribes, it also represents the least appealing aspects of A's derivatives -- the condescending, gloating, verbose preening of vain and insecure men desperate to declare and prove their superiority. He (and you) could have stuck with talking about the admirable efforts of teaching an as-yet unready populace about novel ideas through Socratic dialogue.

Aug 6, 2013 - 11:36am

Thanks benque

Appreciate your compliment.

Just to add one thing on the issue raised by Pining of the attitude of the government employees that the state grants were "free money". This is something I am not personally involved in as a scientific/technical staff member, but I have seen and heard quite a bit on the topic second hand and from other areas of the Department. I can't tell you how many projects that I have to review that have already received money from the state to build, its pathetic. Big corporate money like PPL Energy and they're getting taxpayer money to fund their projects! It's just crazy.

I have to agree with Pining here that the attitude generally is that state grants are "free money" to be handed out as gifts with little regard to how its funded. Personally, I do not agree with this at all. I think there should be very little if any taxpayer money given out in the form of subsidies and grants. And that goes for everything- agriculture, oil and gas, energy- everything. In this I think an even playing field is the only fair way for the government to act - no taxpayer money to any private industry, period.

Aug 6, 2013 - 12:19pm

JML- appreciate your thoughtful comments

And to be clear, I certainly wasn't suggesting that government employees are the only group with negative or 'tribal' attitudes about others, that is certainly not the case. But this was the instance I actually did observe, and thus cannot speak to other examples from personal experience.

I will say that when I worked in a similar situation as yours (in a different state) many years ago, I was left aghast at the way governmental departments behaved when it came to budgets. The entire game, it seemed, was to 1. make the most dire case possible in order to get the most money, then 2. spend every cent of it whether you needed it or not- because if you didn't spend it, someone might not give it to you next year.

So as a 22 year old graduate student, I was told to perform a series of helicopter surveys- places in the backcountry that needed to be surveyed where, instead of having me hike in and camp as usual, getting a bit of overtime in the process, they flew me in daily at a cost of 1000k per hour for the helicopter rental. My supervisor was literally trying to burn money before year end, so they wouldn't cut his budget the next year. So what should have cost a few hundred bucks in overtime instead cost 30 grand over a week... mission accomplished. It is hard to imagine a more perverse set of incentives, but it is easy to see how 40 years of this process leaves the nation as a whole with a deficit of 1.5 trillion per year and a gargantuan governmental apparatus that fights tooth and nail against reform.

Aug 6, 2013 - 4:48pm


Forgot to say, blooming excellent post Pining!

Like some others, your experience doesn't surprise me. I was involved in providing online services to a gov't department, the NHS, in the UK a few years ago.

The NHS is always in financial difficulty, yet some of the things that I was asked to do - off the record - staggered me. I can't go into detail about this, but it was basically "spend as much as you can". It was the complete opposite of what the campaign I was involved in, a fundraiser for a hospital that was going to be closed, was about. I didn't play ball so was dropped.

All the while, those involved (local politicians and senior NHS execs - this was on the MSM all over the UK at the time) were in the press smiling away next to children and parents as they were handed cheques for fundraising activities they (the parents and children) had personally launched to try and help the hospital from closing.

The people in management are TOTAL crooks.

Motley Fool
Aug 6, 2013 - 5:56pm


I suppose, assuming you think they are wrong.

Anyhow, the relevant interesting sentence is this :

"I never thought they[the various gold advocates - MF] would segregate into so many vocal tribes, each trying to advance their own minor position in the gold world and willing to step all over themselves and anyone else in the process."

As regards the post, I do not think the distinction of tribes is made strongly enough. It seems to be government vs the people, whereas I think it to be easy money vs hard money crowd (debtors versus savers) and many of the populace fall in the former group, even those that seem to be rich.

Aug 6, 2013 - 6:22pm

No, FOA is not wrong in his basic premise

...that physical gold represents true (perhaps unparalleled) value, and paper receipts will be destroyed.

I am merely voicing my opinion that the last paragraph was completely unnecessary to illustrate his point, and strikes me as a negative mark on FOA's character:

"Today they chant; " we want our leaders to recognize gold again"! OH, it will all right and the impact such a recognition will have on these various paper gold plays will leave these gold tribes dancing around a midnight fire! (smile) If nothing else, the entertainment of watching them spew brime on each other will be quite an act to follow. If nothing else it will educate future investors as to where to look for reason. Indeed, the law of ages never changes as ones conduct in social interaction still identifies oratory as being worthy or no. People that relish rash interaction always find themselves surrounded by fools. Eventually broke fools! (smile)"

Gloating on, ridiculing and laughing at the folly and suffering of others. Establishing oneself as being on a superior moral and intellectual ground by declaration. Smug elitism is not, to me, a hallmark that deserves respect or admiration. Even if the statement is, indeed, factually true. Also, in his mirth, FOA neglects to ponder the question of what society might look like when 9X% of its population is deprived of most if not all of their accumulated wealth. Schadenfreude will perhaps be an item low on his list of priorities.

The tribes aspect is sort of interesting, though I see the divide as being between those who believe in the fiat system (or rather, cannot conceive a world without it) and those who recognize its fallibility and put their trust in real assets. Gold traders may be in either camp. Also, I do not really see any groundswell movement on the part of GLD shareholders, COMEX metal futures contract owners to lobby governments to 'recognize gold'. As far as I can tell, the few voices who publicly say any such things are firmly in the camp of physical ownership and direct custody of the stuff. The scene he describes therefore comes off as a somewhat juvenile revenge fantasy.

Motley Fool
Aug 7, 2013 - 3:01am


Well, it has to be considered in context, as with everything.

These were one of the final few remarks made by FOA before leaving usagold,because of having had much bile spewn their way. In that context a certain amount of bitterness is understandable.

"FOA neglects to ponder the question of what society might look like when 9X% of its population is deprived of most if not all of their accumulated wealth."

He hasn't, though it is not discussed here.

"As far as I can tell, the few voices who publicly say any such things are firmly in the camp of physical ownership and direct custody of the stuff. The scene he describes therefore comes off as a somewhat juvenile revenge fantasy."

This to me implies you may perhaps not be understanding what he is talking about here, which is understandable as you do not have the context.

" we want our leaders to recognize gold again"!

What he is talking about here is the various groups that want gold recognized as money again, aka institution of a gold standard, whether it be 20,40 or 100% reserved standards, or some other variation such as Real Bills.

Aug 7, 2013 - 8:49am

Dept. HoMeLanD S ecuRity

Just seems odd... that in this small town Marina where I work, where crime is VERY low, the DepT. Of Hom E LanD Se cUriTy has been frequently present.

This town has a great local Police force, and one never sees county or state police, as with other nearby communities they frequent. It is a Playground for the Wealthy.

Since last season I have observed the DOHS cute little white patrol cars (with blue lights atop) and very dark tinted windows, drive into the marina, and just sit and watch. At times, the officer is taking photographs. This is ALL private yachts, none of which are huge boats. There is no international activity at all, the harbor consisting of private vessels.

I just find it odd behavior. I have felt like walking up to the guy and asking him what his purpose being in this small town was. Stand there, blank faced, interacting with no one, like they are standing in the fucking matrix or something.

Why are they taking photos of private boats and a few small commercial fishing vessels?

part of another tribe...

Aug 7, 2013 - 12:11pm

30 year old COMEX documentary

COMEX video documentary from 30+ years ago.

The video is from a program called Evening Magazine.

It is shot at the COMEX on the day of the assassination of Anwar Sadat (6 October 1981).

It's like looking back in a mirror and seeing a different time and a different market.

It's also particularly poignant given the current Egyptian unrest and instability.


Subscribe or login to read all comments.


Donate Shop

Get Your Subscriber Benefits

Exclusive discount for silver purchases, and a private iTunes feed for TF Metals Report podcasts!

Key Economic Events Week of 6/17

6/18 8:30 ET Housing Starts and Building Permits
6/19 2:00 ET FOMC Fedlines
6/19 2:30 ET CGP presser
6/20 8:30 ET Philly Fed
6/21 9:45 ET Markit flash June PMIs

Key Economic Events Week of 6/10

6/11 8:30 ET Producer Price Index
6/12 8:30 ET Consumer Price Index
6/13 8:30 ET Import Price Index
6/14 8:30 ET Retail Sales
6/14 9:15 ET Cap Ute and Ind Prod
6/14 10:00 ET Business Inventories

Key Economic Events Week of 6/3

6/4 All day Fed conference in Chicago
6/4 10:00 ET Factory Order
6/5 9:45 ET Markit Services PMI
6/5 10:00 ET ISM Services PMI
6/6 8:30 ET US Trace Deficit
6/7 8:30 ET BLSBS
6/7 10:00 ET Wholesale Inventories