Here you go. Your own, dedicated playground. Have at it!
That ought to hold some folks down for a few minutes.
Feel free to rebut and contemplate alternative ideas, but do not trot out the mainstream BS. The same people you decry as being liars on the evening news are the ones whose ideas you uphold as being correct in the Islamist debate. See any irony there?
I don't know where you had that on tap at, but well done Turdmeister.
Quick Fast and in a hurry.
Still wandering around in the rabbit holes you sent me into. I haven't forgotten, just busy.
It's late where I am, and I'm tired and jaded after reading, collating and formatting 2400 words of slavering hatred from the "Religion of Peace."
So goodnight to all here. May the true God who made heaven and earth bless and protect us all.
Goodnight and God bless you as well.
Found this over at Brother John F's site.
He puts up some great information over there...
if I bring his comment from Main St. over here.
Commenting on Islam. Fools. You have no idea what the Koran says, don't understand world history and apparently can't even listen to the nightly news in the language of your sworn enemies. If you did or could you would hear it all first hand, from the middle east mainstream, that they have sworn to destroy anyone who does not convert.
Here is a bit of education for those of you who can stomach facts that fly in the face of your emotional and conspiratorial instincts.
Can anyone tell me what happened on September 11, 1683? It bears a direct correlation to 9/11/01. Your enemies know their history, a shame you cannot say the same about yourselves.
What is the "Principle of Abrogation" and why is it important to us right freaking now?
Who cosigned the "Final Solution" and raised two Divisions of troops for Hitler? Why?
What did Hillaire Belloc say about this in 1938?
Why did Jefferson commit the Marines after reading the Koran and spending 17% of US GDP at the time paying the Islamic Jizyah?
How many Jews and Christians did Mohammed behead a day in Medina?
Who claims to have ascended to Heaven? Who does the Bible say will claim they will ascend to Heaven?
Who bows to a blackened rock idol 5 times a day? And those whose knees will not bow, does not their head come off? Is there any mention of this in any other religious texts warning of violence at the hands of this cult?
"Ani Ariff Amerikee."
Stay on task folks. Stick to the metals or open a religious debate thread. I will be happy to provide educational hints to those who might be interested.
I'm not interested in the emotion of who got fucked when or how but I am interested in the history of man. We don't have many muslims in South Dakota but I do understand people. I hope this thread can slow down and become an informative exchange of perception.
I'm on my 5th whiskey coke here, watched the first 35 min of what the west needs to know. Anybody got anything on the positive side of islam?
I cannot find ONE positive thing on islam.
It is all perverted anger.
islam is satanical in nature it seems.
How big of a fool would you have to be to subscribe to this cultist insanity.
Please do not chop my head off for my free speech.
If Washington D.C. spoke like this people would in MENA and elsewhere would be freaking out with worry.
The President of Iran and many around him and elsewhere believe in this stuff fervently and it's their desire for this outcome to happen. It would make their life and history complete.
That's crazy, dangerous and dark.
in my entire life. Neither of them followed their holy book very carefully....I guess you could call them "cafeteria" Muslims, just like cafeteria Catholics. It was when I was living in Hawaii, and they even ate pork at a luau we went to. Maybe people like them are the "peaceful" Muslims everyone talks about. But from what I've been reading lately, a true disciple is required to be neither peaceful nor tolerant. Scary sh*t.
Can't find a translation without clicking on some sketchy-looking links. ani ariff?
... for President. She is the smartest and strongest person around in talking about Muslim issues.
Please see my profile picture as I am offering free kisses to all who disagree with me or Ms. Barnhardt.
Is as hard as woodpecker lips!
I love her strength of character, and wish more Americans would be so willing to stand for what is right and worthwhile.
Thanks for bringing her up.
You may also like this woman:
This interview from 2009 actually covers a wide range of topics, but this part is germane to the current discussion.
Daily Bell: From our point of view, the Middle Eastern wars are intended to spread Western-style collectivist democracy to the Islamic world. Has the West stumbled in its war against the Muslim religion (failure in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, etc.)?
Griffin: Have they stumbled? In my view, the conflict between the Western world and Islam is largely manufactured. There is no question that there are extreme groups within Islam, but my own research leads me to the conclusion that those are the very groups that have been fronted, aided and abetted by forces within America because they wanted to create an enemy – a dreaded foe to justify all the other schemes.
Daily Bell: The BBC, in a program last year came to a similar conclusion.
Griffin: Without an enemy, they cannot fight a war. Without a war, they cannot justify being in the Middle East. If they are not in the Middle East, they can't control the oil and on and on you go.
Daily Bell: So ... it's at least partially manufactured?
Griffin: The war against Islam is manufactured and is actually a war that need not be. Did they fumble the war? No they created it! They created it and it is just a meme. They don't want to win the war! They want to fight the war for ten years, twenty years, thirty years. They are not fumbling it. It is exactly what they want. It is not a question of winning or losing, it's a question of just having it, prolonging it and using it as a means of scaring the daylights out of the American people and conditioning them to accept the loss of their freedom at home.
It is also interesting, to me at least, that the conversation here died down pretty quickly while the Main Street flame war continues.
I have actually been watching, but I had to go to work and then sleep for 5 hours between posts....
Now it's off to kids activities, catching up on my business paperwork (forced confiscation and I have to keep the books to prove I was confiscated from??)
Then off to work again where I will try to keep track of about 8000 miscreants. You know, to perpetuate the false paradigm of war allowing TPTB to maintain total control.
Of course there is no reason to believe me, nor should you in any way consider the previous 1400 years as evidence of trends in behavior. All incursions into Europe from the East were done purely for economic and political reasons. They "didn't like our freedoms" then either. Nor should you accept any current polling results or DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED leaders statements as the truth with regards to their intentions on the West. No just because everyone voted for them does not mean they are popular with the masses. We have simply misunderstood the process and ruined it for them, for which they hate us more. But not all of them. Just the ones who are not living next door.
I hope you can accept my tongue in cheek response without feeling like I am attacking you. I am not. I am simply frustrated with the complete ignorance from my fellows. Western thought, logic and reference timelines are 180 degrees different from the middle and far eastern on many topics. Until someone can actually live amongst them and understand the differences in reasoning, everything else remains a fog. A loud boisterous fog that many of us are wandering around shouting at each other in, but a fog just the same. And that fog has magical properties to our Eastern friends, they can simply see through it. It works for them and they help perpetuate it through organizations like CAIR, and the Holy Land Foundation.
But having limited knowledge and experience does indeed allow one to wallow in their supposed vast repository of nothingness and rely on emotional structures for ideological support. Of course emotions many times are devoid of facts, and therein lies the quandary. How do you get someone to ignore recent history to wake up to the facts of the situation? Especially when they are married to the status quo?
It is not the same as trying to wake someone from the slumber of the economic malaise and see things objectively with metals and sound money being paramount to that understanding.
Or is it?
I have a pretty thick skin. I will address some of this a bit later. Believe it or not, I'm off to the Value Voters Summit.
Never think you have me figured out.