I consider long GLD/short SPY the "control case", so to speak, for that investment thesis. I hadn't thought about the IRA issue, so bad on me. Although if you went long GLD in your IRA and short SPY in your regular account it might work out to a tax advantage, since you are likely to lose money on the short over time...? Just speculatin'.
I also wanted to look at non-leveraged ETFs for comparison because leveraged ones have some of their own problems with failing to track the magnitude of change or even its direction... if you're not familiar with this I can start another topic in the ETF forum.
I'll try to test some other variations on that theme later. Anyway, I agree that for an IRA, FSG may be more appropriate. The only thing that concerns me is how new the fund is, so I would watch its performance closely and keep it on a leash. As with all things.
The company offering that ETF, by the way, offers several unusual leveraged pairs. I expect somebody to offer a long gold/short silver ETF, and vice versa, soon.














Great Stuff Xaritas.
That's basically the kind of thing I was asking near the top of the thread. Whether UGL and DXD were even the proper vehicles to use.
It seems that the main difference you are getting is in the performance of short SPY vs long DXD. Keep in mind however, that those of us trading within an IRA (like me) can't short anything. Therefore, short ETF's are the only option.
When I was first musing about this back on the old blog, I hadn't decided whether to use the 2X approach with UGL+DXD, or whether to stick with DGL+DOG instead. I'd appreciate your thoughts on this, Xaritas.
Oh, and also you are comparing long DXD vs short SPY. You may have introduced some variability there. Why not long DXD vs short DIA? Apples to apples.
Actually, FSG is looking better and better to me.
__________________
Don't fight the Tape. Don't fight the Fed.
Buy Strength, Sell Weakness. Stay in Gear with the Tape.
Leave your Opinions at the Door. Sleep Better at Night.