Murmurs From the 10-Year Note
What happened? Just a few weeks ago, we were worried that the treasury market was becoming a "black hole" that would soon suck in all financial assets. Instead, rates have reversed significantly. What does this mean and what does it portend?
First of all, here's where we were back in late July. The 10-year note had just fallen through 1.40% and it had everyone's attention: http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/blog/4046/two-things-my-mind. Here we are, 3-4 weeks later, and were at 1.82%. That is a HUGE move! What the heck happened? I think I have an answer but, first, some background.
Take a look at these two charts. One a is daily 10-year and one is a weekly. Note that the current price of the 10-year is 132.50. This is important because the area around 132 appears to be very important support. You can plainly see horizontal support on the daily chart but, looking at the weekly chart, 132 is also near the trendline from the lows of late spring 2011. Breaking that support and that trend would set a top and would foreshadow a move to 127-128. Now, look at the weekly chart. Notice that 10-year prices have been in a very long term up channel. Then notice that the past three Fed "programs" have been initiated when prices were near the top of the channel.


So, what is going on? Why the sudden dropoff in price? I think I have the answer. I posted this presentation yesterday. You may have already watched it. Watch it again and stop it right at the end, near the 57 second mark.
Simply put, The Fed is out of bullets. The goal of "Operation Twist" was to create demand for the 10-year and the 30-year, thereby keeping rates low and in a downtrend. They accomplished this "sterilized" program by selling their short-term bills and notes and using the proceeds to buy longer term notes and bonds. Now, look at that final frame again. The Fed is now out of paper to sell. Their current holdings in the 1.5 year and less range are negligible. Therefore, they have no more ammo. Now look again at that last frame. The Fed now owns nearly 70% of the outstanding 10-year note inventory. They are that market. There is hardly anyone left besides the Fed and the Fed is out of cash to keep it going. Suddenly, we have a simple imbalance of more sellers than buyers and...down goes price.
Notice what I said above, "the Fed is out of cash". Like athletic momentum or alcohol-induced desire, this is but a temporary thing. Let me state this clearly again: THE FED CANNOT AND WILL NOT ALLOW RATES TO RESET HIGHER. THE RESULTING BURDEN OF HIGHER INTEREST COSTS ON THE ALREADY ACCUMULATED DEBT WILL ONLY SPEED THE DEMISE OF THE PONZI AND THIS CANNOT BE ALLOWED. Therefore, with rates backing up and with the Fed out of liquidity to support a turnaround, the only option left is a re-ignition of overt quantitative easing.
Will this announcement come from Jackson Hole? Will it come from the next FOMC meeting on 9/12-13? Will it come at the following meeting of 10/23-24? It's impossible to say but what is possible to say is this: Watch the 10-year note. It will tell you.
One more thing for which we must be on guard. Look again at the 10-year daily chart. Do you see the sharp drop in price back in early March. If memory serves me right, wasn't that drop blamed for the demise of the JPM "London Whale"? Didn't everyone conclude that that particular, 4-point move in the note caused a derivative loss for JPM to be somewhere between eight and ten billion dollars? Well, since late July, the 10-year has dropped 3 points. I wonder if any of The Fed's primary dealers are feeling a bit of a pinch right now? Something to think about, that's for sure.
Now, before we get ahead of ourselves, we need to examine the Long Bond and The Pig for confirmation. Their charts are clearly rolling over but, unlike the 10-year, they are not in imminent danger of breaking trend. They must be watched closely, though, as a further break down in each will only serve to apply even more pressure to the 10-year note.




OK, just a couple more things and then I'm taking the rest of the weekend off. First, yesterday's CoT was very interesting, particularly in silver. Before jumping to conclusions, I'm going to wait to see what Uncle Ted thinks of the disaggregated report. In the meantime, here's a C&P of my comments from yesterday afternoon:
Submitted by Turd Ferguson on August 17, 2012 - 2:59pm.
MODERATOR
I had expected gold to be a non-event and it was. For the reporting week, price fell $10 and OI only fell by 67 contracts. The only item of minor note was the 2,478 net drop in The Gold Cartel net short position which brings their net short ratio back under 2 at 1.98:1. Again, this is historically low and very bullish.
The action and the intrigue is in silver. For the reporting week, silver fell 32c but total OI rose by 4700. Obviously, there was a lot of new buying and selling going on. The question was/is: Just whom was on each side? Well...whaddayaknow...it looks like we have a civil war starting in silver.
For the week, The Silver Cartel total long position grew by 3,202 contracts. This is likely the silver "raptors", as Uncle Ted likes to call them. However, The Silver Cartel total short position also grew by 4,752 contracts. This is likely JPM but I'll wait to see who Ted fingers in his report tomorrow.
I've never seen a Silver Cartel long position this high before. Never. Maybe it has been but I sure as heck don't remember when. For perspective, on 2/28/12 it was 33,802 and on 4/20/11 it was 34,043. Nearly identical levels before sharp beatdowns. On 12/27/11, just before a 2-month, 20% UP move, the total long position was 41,224. Now it's 47, 797!
Similarly, the total short position is unusually large. The last time it was this high was on 3/6/12, just after the peak and subsequent beatdown of late February. In the recent past, it has been as high as 89,827 on 4/6/11 and as low as 55,356 back on 12/27/11.
At first glance, we appear to have the makings of a civil war. Instead of acting collusively, the smaller banks seem to be buying and thus attacking the short position of JPM. To contain price, JPM is being forced to issue new paper independently. Again, this is how it appears. Let's wait until Uncle Ted dissects the report before jumping to any more conclusions.
Perhaps the smaller sharks smell blood in the water. Maybe they sense the opportunity to trap JPM on the short side and squeeze the daylights out of them. Could these banks be expecting an historic, hot and explosive move in the weeks ahead???
And then there's this. While researching this post, I came across this video from March 19th. I don't know who this Ilcyzsyzn guy is but, right now, he looks like Nostra-freaking-damus! Hopefully, he's made himself enough money over the past six months that he can buy himself a couple of vowels.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/wait-gold-bottom-1525-ilczyszyn-202824187.html
I hope everyone has a great weekend. Relax and prepare mentally for everything that is soon to come.
TF
Support TF Metals Report with a donation or by purchasing something from the TurdMart Store.








Comments
@Boswell: Re: 100oz?
Word.
Rich Ilczyszyn
Ilczyszyn has been calling PMs with good accuracy for quite some time (but like everyone else, he couldn't foresee the smackdowns we experienced May/Sept2011 & Feb2012).
Worthy of note, he's probably had a career change since the collapse of MFGlobal.
Degrees of Education...
FEMA's Packaging Options...
There's No Reforming Congress...
Obamahood...
Strange - I thought it was
Strange - I thought it was Romney who was desperate to give to the rich.......
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jul/09/mitt-romney-republic...
Normal Trading is Volatile
Thanks for the video, DT (back on 1st page), it's good to know what those hyenas are thinking. I don't get that channel having canceled cable years ago.
To the Turdite who keeps mentioning BTC (exiledbear?) ... this morning it is back down to a $9 handle and falling. I take this to be a 'pure' trading pattern, since none of the bad actors on Wall St are paying any attention to it. Whenever a bunch of BTC traders want to swap some of their stash for some national currency or other, it goes down.
Also, a word of caution ... if there's a general, deflationary, sell-everything event, PMs could still dip. Likely not as far or as long as a lot of paper issues (many of which will simply cease to exist in said event), but they'll dip. And paper claims on PMs would likely evaporate in such an event as well.
Re: 100 oz bar
Slacker, just pick one of the dealers and order ... apmex for example.
But like the guy said, click on the link here and then order. It will really help.
This just keeps getting better....
First, the massive banknote paper order.
Then, a Euro sculpture is removed from the Frankfurt airport.
Now, I came across this this AM: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/9484435/Lord-Rothschi...
Are these pigs about to peg the Euro to the other Pig?
UR/100 oz bar
I see that APMEX does do some international shipping, but I did not see Thailand included in their list of countries. There may be some Asian connections that are better, but I certainly would not know anything about them. Many do not offer international shipping.
@ Dagney
Rothschild shorting the Euro.
Soros dumped his bank stocks.
The big fish are getting ready for something......
An £130 million position is
An £130 million position is nothing in fx terms....
Former Barclays CEO 'held back evidence'
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2012/08/2012818175830695965.html
Former Barclays CEO 'held back evidence'
Parliamentary committee claims Bob Diamond held back evidence during hearings on the Libor rate-rigging scandal.
British parliamentarians have accused former Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond of holding back evidence during a hearing last month over the Libor rate-rigging scandal.
In a report issued on Saturday regarding the manipulation of a key inter-bank interest rate, the cross-party Treasury Select Committee claimed that Diamond offered "highly selective" evidence when he was questioned over the Libor affair.
The committee also accused British regulators of showing serious shortcomings in their failure to stop Barclays manipulating the key Libor interest rate.
"The sustained rigging of a crucial benchmark rate has done great damage to the UK's reputation. Public trust in banks is at an all-time low," Andrew Tyrie, the committee's chairman, said.....
100 oz bars
I've bought from Apmex, Kitco, a local wholesaler, and Provident. I pretty much only order from Provident now, mainly because they are local (DFW) and they take personal checks, which they sit on for a week before shipping.
I've had some issues with Apmex with shipments disappearing when they used USPS. I believe someone at the OKC sorting facility was "losing" boxes from APMEX. I'm sure that's been fixed.
APMEX did send out nice Christmas gifts to their bigger customers.
OANDA...
I just tried to register for a live account...
They're no longer accepting new registrations from the US.
Interesting...
I don't know why, but after 4pm I'll give them a call.
Re: Rothschild £130m short
Why would he make such a position public? Is he pulling a Goldman's? Remember how these people worked the sheep at Waterloo.
Random silver question for the crew
Has anyone bought one of the 1000 oz Industrial Silver bars? If so, I would be interested in what you think of them- hard to handle due to the weight? Is the size a problem for storage?
I am wondering because I read something over the weekend that suggested that if we ever have a true supply squeeze in silver, at the high price point when all of the industrial demand would still need to be met, a situation could easily develop where these bars command a significant premium, while "investment grade" silver in smaller denominations would not due to the fact that re-melting and casting all those 1 oz rounds would be inefficient, expensive, and take time. The inference was that, to get the most out of your silver investment, you would need to have these suckers on hand. Additionally, price over spot for these is only around 30-40 cents per oz, rather than the 2-3$ we pay for 1 oz rounds... also not insignificant when charting your bottom line.
I would be interested to hear thoughts on this if people are so inclined!
Bad Form
Apparently a few "community members" are still intent on hijacking things in this "community":
http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/comment/201556#comment-201556 "i hijacked the Ayn Rand thread. i'm thinking of renaming it."
Libertarians do not hijack anything.
Aren't we passed this?
just use the comments tab to find old comments
Symbolism? Somehow I just don't trust the official explanation:
El G, 100 oz bar
I did not know that slacker lives outside the Hew Hess of Hay. Sorry.
Mr. Taggert
P-wood used the term "hijacked" to refer to the fact that he made a bunch of posts on the thread- he was using the term jokingly to refer to his numerous posts , not in the sense that he twisted the topic to another topic, which is the negative connotation of that term. If you read his posts on the thread in question, you will see that he was on-topic, discussed his opinion of Rand and Objectivism (some he agrees with, some he doesn't), and was well within the bounds of normal discourse.
So I would say that yes, we are past all this. Most of us, anyway.
Sunday reading
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~ejchaisson/reprints/energy_evolution_ethics.pdf
I find this interesting, especially the question - how to achieve this state of ethics that allows to achieve increased complexity and Power per mass ratio - by global government -what does planetary citizenship mean - or individual evolution - by choosing from competing philosophies/religions marketplace?
By principle of evolution it should be a free market of scores of competing ideologies ( intellectual fluctuations) where the best survive and guide.
12 pages but big letters. By Eric. J. Chaisson.
@Pining
I've considered the 1000 oz bars a while back.
Then I considered my potential bad back from trying to move them around.
Not worth risking injury......I'm serious.
100 oz Bar
I would much rather have 100 1 ounce bars than 1- 100 ounce bar. Hard to make change in a poker game with a 100 oz. bar.
Yes, Bad Form
Upon further review, i stand corrected. Sorry P-wood.
civility!!! wtf
nice to see the forum talking about PM for most of the 2 days. maybe Turd needs to post on saturday to keep us focused..there seems to be very positive vibes the last week or so... anyway Stack
My weekend report
http://arum-geld-gold.blogspot.com/2012/08/august-20th-my-thoughts-on-week-ahead.html
Whitebeard +
Thanks for the heads up about the End of the road documentary. That was very well done. I am gonna see about buying a copy to pass around to friends and family! I would encourage every one to watch that one!
Pining's 1000 Oz Silver Bar
Pining I have seen these bars carried openly in Mumbai and other parts of India where Jewelry/Bullion dealers do business. A strong man can carry this bar (30 Kgs Apprx) without a problem. But carrying 10 such bars at a time in a car trunk can be a problem. Storing is not a issue. At time I feel carrying this bar and running away is so difficult that someone taking this away from any place without getting noticed is difficult.
Presently in India there is glut of these bars as there is no demand and premium is only 1000 Rs per bar. It works out to be 30 cents per Kg i.e. 9.33~ 10 cents per Oz over spot.
Many medium/large bullion dealers would deal only with 1000 Oz bars. I do not know premium on smaller quantities. In India I believe Silver is in Industrial demand than investment demand. People are inclined to buy Gold for investment and Jewelry than Silver. Even Govt of india increased custom duty on Gold but kept duty on Silver unchanged during last budget. They want people buying Silver rather than Gold as Gold import is exactly equal to Indian's current a/c deficit about 4% of GDP.
My advice to you is, be careful with 1000 Oz bar as anyone can recognize you from a distance and guess what you are carrying. It all depends on your neighborhood. Check all your handling options and decide.