The Epic Battle Continues

On one side, we have The Specs. These" investors" seek an exposure to gold through ownership of the paper derivative offered by The Comex. On the other side, we have The Banks. These "criminals" fraudulently create unlimited amounts of unbacked paper gold and sell them to The Specs in an attempt to cap price and, ultimately, profit by covering at lower prices. Which side will win? With open interest near record levels in both gold and silver, we're likely not going to have to wait much longer to find out.

If you somehow managed to sleep through yesterday, here's a recap. It was typical of the new, post-April 19 norm. Prices rose on the Sunday evening Globex. They rose further in Asia and they even extended through the London session. However, after hitting highs above $1290 in early Comex trading, prices were slammed for $15 in 15 minutes in a move that left many "analysts" searching for explanations:

Perhaps your sweet, loving and harmless local analyst can help these "puzzled" folks out a bit?

The action on The Comex yesterday was simply another act of desperation on the part of The Banks. The issued and dumped an inordinate amount of paper gold, calculated by ZeroHedge to be in excess of $2.3B notional:

Were these Banks suddenly in a rush to sell an accumulated long position? Was immediate liquidation so important that an entire position needed to be blown out in minutes? Or we're The Banks simply dumping a whole bundle of new paper contract supply onto the "market"? In doing so, The Banks would clearly be attempting to manipulate prices lower, either to simply cap the days gains or to protect against the incredible losses that would be incurred if/when price surges through $1300. Recall that as of the most recent Bank Participation Report, The Banks were NET short nearly 200,000 Comex contracts. This means that every $10 move in price equates to a $200M paper loss. Accordingly, a gold price that surges from $1300 to $1400 would force another $2B+ in losses upon The Banks. Do you think they'd like to avoid this fate?

Thus we have days like yesterday. And how do we know this to be true? The answers can be found in the CME's own open interest numbers which are updated daily. If yesterday's massive contract dump had emanated from a Spec long, Comex history and paper market dynamics would have suggested a significant decrease in total open interest. The Specs would have sold longs. The Banks would have taken the other side of the trade and bought to cover shorts. Open interest would have been retired and the total number of contracts outstanding would have declined. On the flip side, if the massive dump emanated from a Bank issuing a whole bundle of new paper shorts, we would expect to see a significant increase in total open interest.

Well, the open interest numbers for yesterday are out and what do we have??? An increase of 16,767 contracts to a new, multi-year high of 596,513 paper contracts.

So now that we know just which parties were responsible for the raid and selling yesterday, it's time to once again discuss WHY The Banks operate this way. Aside from their BIS and Central Bank mandate to manage price, The Banks manage and manipulate the precious metals because they profit from it! Having the unlimited ability to create an endless supply of anything gives you direct control over whatever market you "make". And, for the past three years, this has provided a stream of easy profits for these Bank trading desks. They would simply issue as many new contracts as necessary to wait out The Specs. Eventually, price would top out and momentum would stall. All it would take was usually one good shove from The Banks and down would go price. The Specs would all rush for the exits and The Banks would use the ensuing selling to buy back and cover nearly all of their recently issued shorts.

The most recent and egregious example of this was last October and we documented the entire process as it unfolded, hopefully saving all of you some fiat and undue anxiety in the process. Here are two charts from the archives that effectively describe the process. These are dated 11/18/15 and labeled in such a way as to make it all quite clear:

The Banks are attempting the same maneuver now, writ large. Writ very, very large! Check the chart below and notice the same style of open interest flooding and price capping, only on a much larger scale and with much higher stakes:

Let's have some fun with math. Shall we?

As noted above, on January 28 of this year, total Comex gold open interest was 373,252 contracts representing 37,325,200 ounces of paper gold. That night price was $1116 and the CME Gold Stocks report showed a total vaulting of 6,427,038 ounces.

By March 11, price had risen to $1261 and total open interest was 506,363 contracts representing 50,636,300 ounces of paper gold with the CME Gold Stocks showing a total Comex vault of 6,815,280 ounces.

As of last night, price was $1274 and total open interest was 596,513 contracts representing 59,651,300 ounces of paper gold with the CME Gold Stocks showing a total Comex vault of 7,595,687 ounces.

So, over the period January 28 to May 16:

  • Paper price has risen by $158 or 14.16%
  • Total Comex open interest has risen by 223,261 contracts representing 22,326,100 ounces of paper gold or an increase of 59.82%.
  • Total Comex vault stocks have risen by 1,168,649 ounces of gold or an increase of 17.15%
  • Leverage of paper ounces to total Comex stocks has increased from 5.81:1 to 7.84:1 or an increase of 34.94%.

If The Comex Banks had just been forced to maintain the already-fraudulent 5.81:1 ratio of paper to vault stocks from January 28, then total open interest allowed as of yesterday would only have been 441,309 contracts. And if total open interest was 155,000 contracts LESS than what it currently is, do you suppose that price would be a bit higher than $1272?

So, what's the point of all this? Once again, we're simply attempting to draw attention to the hopelessly corrupt and fraudulent, paper derivative pricing scheme. In the absence of any meaningful physical delivery, the "price" discovered on the Comex is not a price for gold (or silver) at all. Instead, the only price being discovered is the price of the derivative, itself. Nothing more.

However, there is a secondary point worth noting. Go back up and check that chart from November 18. Note the size of the "Commercial" NET short positions. Back then, the Gold Commercials saw their NET position reach 166,000 contracts and the 24 Banks included in the Bank Participation Report saw their NET position reach to 99,119 contracts short. As of last week, the Gold Commercial NET short position hit 285,000 contracts and this month's BPR revealed a 24 Bank NET short position of 195,262 contracts. Are The Banks beginning to get squeezed? Is there a limit to the amount of unbacked, naked short positions that they are willing to create and maintain. Is it possible that they are blindly putting good money after bad in a desperate attempt to save their accumulated positions? Could The Banks actually lose and be forced to cover, all the while sustaining massive losses? These are good questions. Perhaps we should consult "The London Whale" for answers:

At the end of the day, be patient yet remain firm. Recognize the forces aligned against you, however, and know that they are conspiring against you. Will they lose control? Only time will tell. In the meantime, simply remain alert and prepare accordingly for all possible outcomes.



Turd Ferguson's picture

What do you think?


Should we make this one "public" later today? I'm open to suggestions.

Sanford's picture


#1 ?

Nice way to start the day...

UulaBear's picture


Is this really happening? Do I get the gold?

nope, getting the silver in a photo finish

amarula4's picture


Marcrward's picture


holding it for you Marchas

GoldisMoney's picture



not the most enlightened post lol!

make it public 

Dirt_Reynolds's picture

Make it public

I vote yes.

trx16's picture

Public :YES

Understandable and to the point: Do what you do best.

infometron's picture

Go for it, Craig!

Then some may be inclined to educate themselves further:

Can't do better than starting with Aristotle

And then think for themselves!

Underdawg's picture

Go For It

I say make it public, we are already getting our moneys worth. Maybe by making it public, you can add more subscribers.

canary's picture

Chuck Butler (Daily Pfennig)

He found that an unexpected Yellen's speech has been added to her calendar on June 6th...Before the Fed meeting and after the BLS on June 3rd.

dryam's picture

Public? Absolutely!!!!

Cockroaches don't like light because that's how they get stepped on.

question's picture

As One Who Recently

got out the crowbar to release a few coins to be allowed to peruse these hallowed missives I vote for making it public; the level of discourse behind the pay wall, IMHO, is a better showcase for what's available from the Watchtower (I miss that name).

bently's picture

Shall we make this one public?

You bet!!

Turd Ferguson is the Thomas Paine of a large and growing movement honest-money, liberty-loving truth tellers.

Ronnie55's picture

SGE pricing

Hey Craig,

The us dollar price of gold in China as of today is around 1280 Us dollars. If the chinese decide to not allow the price to devalue much from here will that not cause the bankers a lot of potential problems with arbitrage if they attempt to smash the price down to much. In other words the chinese have the bankers boxed unless they are working together to control price. Make it public.

mgilbert's picture

Make Public - YES

Yes - we need to get this to the masses

tyberious's picture

Yep!! Public 

Yep!! Public 

Royal Flush's picture

Throw the guests a bone.

It might wake some visitors up and save them some fiat.

legacyelectric's picture


Make it Public

Maximus's picture


Yes, do go public.  It benefits everyone.

renozep's picture

Make it Public

Perhaps Zhedge will pick up on this one too.  Craig, your sustained efforts to expose 

the criminals is taking root beyond TFMR.  Keep at it, and thanks.

TF Metals fan's picture

Go public!

If ever this would lead to an inquiry at least it can be highlighted that somewhere in the universe people (Turd) were warning. 

amarula4's picture

@Go for it, Craig! Submitted by infometron

the truth about Aristotle, from a Youtube pundit? I used to read *about* Aristotle and Plato, and listen to lectures about them, thought they were too clever for me - above me head. Then I finally braved it - and discovered that the pundits gave less than half the truth, and the genius of Plato and Aristotle lay partly in being supremely good communicators who gave their own truth better than others could give their truth...try Aristotle's 'Nicomachean Ethics', and Plato's 'Apology', 'Republic', and 'Euthyphro', and you will see what I mean

Turd Ferguson's picture

Pudgy starts moving thigs back down


coin collectress's picture


Yes indeed!!!

Spread the words of the Turd!

Nick Elway's picture

London whale Iksil without

London whale Iksil without the wsj ad/paywall Feb 22 2016:

edit: The original letter would be even better, but I haven't found it..

Turd Ferguson's picture

Has anyone noticed this yet today?


Holy Moly, AG just broke through $12. WOW!

We just discussed in last night's podcast that it had broken through $11. Here's an updated weekly chart. Again, it almost has to see some temporary resistance near $12.50. IF not, we're looking at $14 or even $16! And what happens if gold shoots through $1308 and rockets toward $1400, taking silver along for the ride?

Turd Ferguson's picture

And it's not just First Majestic


Check out other silver producers such as PAAS and SSRI.

PAAS is breaking out through $16 and setting its sights upon $20+

And SSRI is lagging a little but a Friday close north of $10 would look to be a big deal:

GrampAg's picture

Go Public

Excellent piece that will help the masses!

Turd Ferguson's picture

And we just discussed GDXJ yesterday, too


And looky here...New 2016 highs reached today and it still looks like $45 and even $55 are logical targets:

Syndicate contentComments for "The Epic Battle Continues"