Meandering Monday

Well, the week has begun and, so far, it's unfolding about the way we expected.

On a day like today, where London is closed and the entire week last was UP, you'd normally expect some give back. So far, not so much. In fact, the silver market has traded almost exactly as anticipated. Volatility at the Globex open last night. A surge from Asia. A pushback from Europe. A continued rally in NY. We've broken $31 and are holding strongly, even in the face of falling crude and capped gold. This is very impressive and somewhat reassuring. Tomorrow will be the interesting test. With London back in, will silver surge higher or be pressed lower? Once NY opens, will silver rebound on a "Happy Tuesday" or will a mini-raid develop? For now, I expect continued strength as I see several areas of strong support on the chart and silver remains well above all of its moving averages.

Gold is hanging in there, too, but is being subjected to much more aggressive capping than silver. There can be no doubt that The Gold Cartel would prefer that gold stays below its Battle Royale line as well as the area around 1680. Just like 1635 last week, you can be certain that there are a plethora of buy-stops positioned above 1675-80 and The Cartel does not want to see them triggered. Will they succeed? Maybe for a few days this week but, ultimately, they will fail. Gold will then surge toward 1700 and, once it starts printing $17**, it will likely rally toward the next logical battle zone near 1720.

All of this is in the face of falling crude prices this morning. That crude is down should not come as a surprise to anyone here. I had told you that crude would trade to $98 last week and it did. I then suggested that a pullback would follow before a consolidation. The next move in crude will drive it to and through $100 and, from there, it will likely move rapidly toward $105. This is a very tradable move so be ready. Any dip to $94 and below would be a logical entry point and I'll be watching it closely.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/crude-plunges-spr-release-rumor-trumps-qeisaac-efforts

Lastly, I'm sorry but I need to do this one more time because of the costs and effort needed for setup. As you know, it has been suggested that Andrew Maguire and I "team up" for an options trading service. The platform would be similar to Andy's current "DayTrades" service where trades are posted in realtime and the subscriber has the discretion to either follow along or not. Here are other random thoughts that I printed last week:

1.  I'm quite uneasy at recommending options trading to anyone given the inherent risks involved and my oft-stated concerns for the viability of the current "system". After the MFG and PFG debacles, everyone should be wary of holding cash, or anything else for that matter, within the confines of a customer account. That said, I could be wrong. That Ann Barnhart gal could be wrong, too. Maybe MFG and PFG are simply one-offs and everything is fine. I recognize, though, that there are still literally thousands of people worldwide who are still actively trading. Therefore, I'm content to go forward but under the banner of "proceed at your own considerable risk".
2.  I've been trading options for over 25 years now. In my "career", I've always been forced to enter The Den of Thieves armed with nothing but my own experience, wisdom and charts. To think that I could enter again but, this time, have the experience of Andrew Maguire to guide me?...well that is pretty compelling.
3.  After 25 years, I do at least have some idea of what I'm doing. All trades established by Andy and I will only be placed if we are in agreement that the trade makes sense. This clearly doesn't guarantee success but I'd like to think it increases our chances a bit.
4.  It's not going to be cheap but it shouldn't be. First of all, we don't want totally inexperienced traders taking a stab at it simply because the subscription is just $20/month. Additionally, at $250/month, the service would be a bargain. Subscribers would need to maintain an account balance of $15,000-25,000 so we're only talking about a 1-2% monthly vig.
5.  For those that don't trade futures options but do trade equity options, we'll try to offer an alternative ETF option play whenever possible. For example, a Dec12 gold call trade might be matched with a DecGLD call.

Again, IF WE DO THIS, the fee will be $250/month. Why so expensive you ask? One, anything of value is not cheap AND two, we need to limit the amount of subscribers and a high cost helps with this. Much of the time, we'll be taking positions in options that don't have a huge amount of open interest. If, all of a sudden, we had 1000 people putting in orders for an option with only a few hundred in OI, it could immediately skew the entire dynamic of the trade. Therefore, it is preferable to have 100 subscribers rather than 1000.

So here's what I need from anyone who is seriously still interested. Please send me an email at:

turdistheman at gmail dot com

Nothing fancy, just say "yes, I'm interested" or something of that nature. If it looks like we're going to have 100 subscribers, then Paul and Andy will go ahead and set it up. Personally, I hope we can do this because, with more QE in the horizon and the other "fundamental changes" I'm expecting, I think our chances at success are pretty high. So, again, anyone who thinks they'd participate needs to send me an email at the address above. (This is, of course, non-binding. It's not like I'm going to beat you to death if you ultimately change your mind and decide not to join. It's just that taking the time to send an email gives us a much stronger indication of general interest.)

As I close, I see that price continues to hang in there at $1670 and $31. After the moves we had last week and with London closed, I'm relieved that things are going as well today as they are. Let's just get through this day and then see what tomorrow brings. With all the fresh shorting supplied by The Cartels last week, I'm expecting (hoping for) a somewhat happy Tuesday.

Have a great day and pray that Isaac continues as a tropical storm for as long as possible.

TF

Comments

HeNateMe's picture

@ Straying

No, that's rhetoric. 

HeNateMe

Island Teal's picture

Island - Consider DIG or HOU

thanks....

reefman's picture

@Peaches, It is at times

@Peaches,

It is at times like these that being cautious is a good idea. One wants to limit thier down-side risk. That is why going big into call options at this juncture is a good risk-averse idea. Also keeping at little cash as possible and putting most of it on the trade is a good way to avoid downside risk. 

Bollocks's picture

How to deal with angry people...

crg's picture

GDX..love the action..

Awesome dump on the chart... /sarc...Just looked at EGO, ABX..fine action...crazy...

reefman's picture

Here is one of my options plays for SLV

Here is one of my plays for silver – as you can see, a small gain in the underlying security yields massive gains:

http://opcalc.com/1DRg

If silver hits $36/ounce (~$35.50 SLV) by October 1st I will be up 500% - sell it and buy phys. If it hits $37/ounce I will be up nearly 1,000%. Is it possible for silver to go up $6 in two months? Sure. If it goes up more than that, then even better. 

The worst that could happen is that I loose all of it. The biggest risk is squandering this "perfect storm" for the metals. 

$4,500 in, $45,000 out. 

Prize Fighter's picture

FYI, I posted that Bullion

FYI, I posted that Bullion Tracker lost my saved data but I was told by NWT Mint the recent Adobe Air 3.4 update has a problem and has messed up many programs which use Adobe. 

Current workaround is to uninstall Adobe AIR 3.4 and install the Adobe AIR 3.3 Runtime from here:

http://helpx.adobe.com/air/kb/archived-air-sdk-version.html#main-pars_header_7

I did it and all my "lost" data reappeared no problem.

Mickey's picture

this is one tough market sector to trade

(without being "in the know")

add in a rumor of spr release which is a part of being "in the know"

there are more ways and players  to manipulate a market than we can count

just ride their coattails

ClinkinKY's picture

Scroll on past if you're "sensitive"

SilverWealth's picture

imo

IMO Turd Silver could be strong today because London is not on. And because its trading high above its 8,21 and 50 though it is a sign of strength longer term it is also a warning of possible quick reversion to the mean back down to these.

also, do you really think that Pres. Hopey McChange will allow oil to just rally true to market thru 100 into his coronation? I have serious doubts. Hopey has intervened at least 2x before in this market, there is precedent. Once again if one is buying high or averaging down into the oil trade, it could be risky IMO.

Swift Boat Vet's picture

Turdski ----- Those coffee stains....

...are worth a separate hat tip, but alas!  I can only tip once.

I think your various trading plans are excellent for those who fit well with those scenarios, but I would really like some help/advise as a long term stacker only.

Just before the May 2011 and subsequent price slaughters in silver,  I had a very uneasy feeling about price being too high too fast and had stopped buying at about $35 - $36. 

As a stacker,  I am loathe to ever part with even one ounce yet,  but would like some advice during those times where silver/gold feel toppy on how to effectively hedge using (out of the money ?) stock or ETF put/call options to soften the blow should there be a serious correction or retracement prior to another run up. 

Kind of along the lines of, "To hedge a stack of 1000 ozs,  purchase/sell X number of XYZ (stock or ETF or ?) options."   That way,  stackers of every size could figure a decent strategy to hedge if they so desired. Kind of a full/partial stack insurance plan.  'Catch my train'?

Swifty

The Springbok's picture

beans

Hi Turd,

I am really enjoying the daily podcast, thanks. Wondered if you may have a few lines to say about today's action in Soybeans. No probs if it doesn't fit with your intentions for today's recording, but thought I would ask

StevenBHorse's picture

Hedging for a stacker

Is called dollar cost averaging.

"Kind of a full/partial stack insurance plan"

Do you not understand that the stack is the insurance?

"I would really like some help/advice as a long term stacker only"

1)  Measure your wealth in ounces not fiat

2) Stop being a pussy, it's only paper

Everything thing else you talk about being worried about can be alleviated if you refer to point 1). 

mj12's picture

Nadex

I concur with TF ....using future options with the counsel of Andy and Paul to direct your trading could be quite profitable. They are great teachers.

"Learning to trade is not easy. Nor is teaching people how to learn to trade because the art of profitable trading has many elements to it.

When you're looking for teacher I think it is far better that you ask questions about that person, that do not pertain to how much money he or she claims they can make for you.

First of all there is no way anyone can guarantee that you will be successful at trading or you'll be successful at any moment in your career of trading.

What entitles one to teach?

I have wrestled with that idea for many years. A good model is perhaps to look at coaches. I read the story about Mark Spitz's swimming coach who could not swim. Yet he coached Mark to 6 gold medals.

I read the story of one of the world's best basketball players, Lou Alcindor/Kareem Abdul Jabar, who tried coaching and was a disaster at it.

Just because you're good at doing something doesn't mean you can teach it to others. Equally important is to understand that just because you can't do it doesn't mean you can't teach. Isn't that interesting?

Most importantly of all is understanding that the teacher has the position of opening doors, and your performance will never be the exact same as his or hers.

I'm certain that Joe Montana could show me exactly how to throw a football, and I'm equally certain he could still throw it lot better than me. I should not have the expectation to perform at his ability.

I still think however that the best teachers in this business... and there are some good ones... actually trade. But how do you know? That's simple, ask them for their trading results, and ask them to show you their current trades. If they don't have any, they are not trading. It is just that simple." LW

Binary Options at NADEX could be used for those who just want to test their potential before swimming with the sharks....... you can open an account for $100.00 and make options trades on gold/silver for as little as $1.00.......your downside risk and upside profits are limited but the program is designed for beginners.

Swift Boat Vet's picture

Stevie Ol' Buddy

I dollar cost average all the time, and have for ages.  My question was about insurance against a sizeable plunge.  I will not sell my ounces on that feeling, but I will risk a few FRNs to finance an additional purchase at the new, lower price, should that happen.  THAT is the extent of my 'risk money',  the vast majority goes into the stack.....always!

Swifty

TD's picture

Greater wealth is a taller stack

I have reached the point in my walk that I am not impressed with the size of one's stack of fiat currency, or that it has grown through magnificent maneuvers.  Fiat will one day... quickly...  soon... become worthless.  I might as well get on eBay and buy some extra monopoly money and just keep my precious.

I doesn't matter to me at all if my stack is worth more in dollars today than it was. I am not any more wealthy if my stack is worth more in fiat, but what matters is if the stack itself has grown in size... in weight. The measure of ones wealth is not "how many dollars", "it's how many ounces"... or preferably... "how many pounds".

I love hearing the stories on here of folks telling of their latest purchases, and the occasional photo. It makes my day. Keep it up. Think long term.

TD

ratioarbitrage's picture

A Dollar A Gram

Was beautifully defended today. First with faux naturel raggedness at 31, then with horizontal abandon at 31.20. Remember that after 1DAG comes the forbidden thought of 2DAG.

Dyna mo hum's picture

What a deal...... haha

http://www.ebay.com/itm/500-MILLION-ZIMBABWE-DOLLARS-X-1000-BANK-NOTES-BRICK-/230695389330?pt=Paper_Money&hash=item35b6844892          A frickin brick no less.

ancientmoney's picture

Financial repression--an observation . . .

Given that the Fed/Treasury are, and have been repressing the financial world in order to keep inflation from being recognized, it makes me wonder if we will ever see new highs in gold and silver--at least as long as COMEX trading occurs.

From the COTs it appears to me-- I'm no expert by any means--that the BBs sell short whatever amount necessary, whenever they feel a need to repress silver and gold prices.  There is no reason to expect that to change, as they do not fear reprisal; they are a part of the repression scheme.  As someone here said earlier in a post, rules will change, and no physical delivery will ever be required of a BB. 

We might see the effect of silver shortages via a rising premium, but I don't believe we will again see $50+ silver "spot" so long as COMEX trades.

Assuming that physical shortages change the rules so that no bids are allowed on COMEX, only offers (shorts), then the paper spot price could well approach zero.  This way they would never have to admit to declaration of a signal commercial failure--the "official" silver price would just not move up from just above zero.  Later on, they may recreate the rules to actually allow trading again, but likely in such a way as to keep prices in check better than a free market might allow.  These would be prices at which the government contractors would "officially" buy the silver needed for defense, etc.

There would likely be some period of time wherein nobody will know the true value of physical.  It is during this time that having 3-6 months of fiatskis to pay bills may be helpful, along with smaller denominations of pre-1965 U.S. 90% silver coins like dimes, and quarters as people will start to catch on that fiat dollars, yen, euro, etc. are all worthless scrip.  Because the government will keep its heavy hand on silver "for national security purposes" and for the "good of the people" true price discovery may be difficult.  A black market in physical will likely become the best price discovery mechanism available.

I just can't see how the Fed/Treasury could ever allow a precious metal like gold or silver get away from them, in free-market fashion.  Gold may be officially sanctioned and one-time repriced to allow for counterbalancing the debt, but silver may become known as the strategic metal that it is, and governments will regulate it to their liking.

If anyone has a good argument to refute me on this opinion, I'm all ears.

boatman's picture

isaac

best tracks for this storm [GFDI and GFTI]

now have isaac crossing coast at lake charles.................as a tropical storm.......low cat 1 hurricane worst case scenario

tobydaniel's picture

Nice Wipeout of gains!

Hope somebody enjoyed the 31's..... The fact that they could wipe out our gains that fast is a bit unnerving. A couple more moves like that and we will be back in the 20's again.

Turd Ferguson's picture

This sucks

MODERATOR

Standard EE bullshit. Let the poor bastards bid the metals higher on the Comex. We'll rip it back out and more on the Globex when no one is looking. Such a fucking joke.

As stated in this post, let's look for support near 30.75 but likely EE intent means that 30.25 is probably coming. In gold, let's look for support near 1660.

Actually, these charts are now stale. Gold is now down ten fucking dollars since the close and silver is off 35cents. Such a fucking joke. Please excuse my profanity but this sorry excuse of a "market" is such a complete sham hosejob that it makes me sick.

Turd Ferguson's picture

If you're offended by my anger above...

MODERATOR

...then you'll likely really hate this post.

http://tfmetalsreport.blogspot.com/2010/12/ok-now-im-pissed.html

The audacity to raid silver like this, after hours on the Globex, when no one is around, is breathtaking and outright manipulatively criminal. How much value was overtly stolen from customer trading accounts this afternoon? All for the sake of prolonging the myth of the fractional-reserve bullion bank.
These people should be prosecuted. To bunch paper sell orders and overwhelm the bid at 3:30 in the afternoon, all in the face of a flat USDX, wreaks of desperation. Only the desperate, strung-out meth whore dares rob a bank in broad daylight for need of that next "fix", to survive till tomorrow.
This is over-the-top BS and I'm sick of it!
7:00 EST ADDENDUM
I've noticed in some of the comments that there is some shock and surprise that Turd would get emotional and, perhaps, lose perspective. I'd like to clear this up.
I was asked to start this blog four weeks ago so that folks from ZH could more readily access my thoughts...perhaps save time digging through endless ZH threads looking for my silly, yellow hat.
Graham from Australia asked me last week to never couch my opinions or word things in such a way as to be intentionally vague or non-committal. My promise then is my promise now: I will always tell you exactly what I think, no BS. Take it for what its worth. Use it as a resource.
I've been observing and trading commodities and metals for years. I firmly believe that, in the precious metals, the evil consortium of bullion banks actively attempts to suppress price on a near daily basis. They have done this for years and they did it again today. However, rarely are they so brazen. Are they desperate or untouchable? I don't know for sure. What I do know is that what they did today in the destruction of the myth of a free market as well as millions if not billions of investor/trader dollars was outright criminal and it makes me sick to my stomach. 

 

ancientmoney's picture

@Turd

I repeat my post of a few minutes ago, to followup your rant . . .

Given that the Fed/Treasury are, and have been repressing the financial world in order to keep inflation from being recognized, it makes me wonder if we will ever see new highs in gold and silver--at least as long as COMEX trading occurs.

From the COTs it appears to me-- I'm no expert by any means--that the BBs sell short whatever amount necessary, whenever they feel a need to repress silver and gold prices.  There is no reason to expect that to change, as they do not fear reprisal; they are a part of the repression scheme.  As someone here said earlier in a post, rules will change, and no physical delivery will ever be required of a BB. 

We might see the effect of silver shortages via a rising premium, but I don't believe we will again see $50+ silver "spot" so long as COMEX trades.

Assuming that physical shortages change the rules so that no bids are allowed on COMEX, only offers (shorts), then the paper spot price could well approach zero.  This way they would never have to admit to declaration of a signal commercial failure--the "official" silver price would just not move up from just above zero.  Later on, they may recreate the rules to actually allow trading again, but likely in such a way as to keep prices in check better than a free market might allow.  These would be prices at which the government contractors would "officially" buy the silver needed for defense, etc.

There would likely be some period of time wherein nobody will know the true value of physical.  It is during this time that having 3-6 months of fiatskis to pay bills may be helpful, along with smaller denominations of pre-1965 U.S. 90% silver coins like dimes, and quarters as people will start to catch on that fiat dollars, yen, euro, etc. are all worthless scrip.  Because the government will keep its heavy hand on silver "for national security purposes" and for the "good of the people" true price discovery may be difficult.  A black market in physical will likely become the best price discovery mechanism available.

I just can't see how the Fed/Treasury could ever allow a precious metal like gold or silver get away from them, in free-market fashion.  Gold may be officially sanctioned and one-time repriced to allow for counterbalancing the debt, but silver may become known as the strategic metal that it is, and governments will regulate it to their liking.

If anyone has a good argument to refute me on this opinion, I'm all ears.

Fired's picture

Turd, you of all people

Turd, you of all people should know that the markets exist to drain the wealth of people who think they function as real markets. When you know they are broken, you just follow the trends. The trend for PMs has been up for 10 years and continues since its simply too powerful for them to break.

ReachWest's picture

Nausea

Ya - this hit-job in the Globex is pretty nauseating. I hope tomorrow gets better follow-through with London open again.

I must admit - this bullcrap is getting pretty old and damned predictable too.

Edit to Add: It certainly appears that the Bullion Bankers still have a firm hand on this market. They will squash, manipulate and control it to their advantage, to put more cash in their pockets and ensure that the threat to the almighty green-back is minimized. Argh! I can only believe that real "natural" (Supply/Demand) markets will prevail, at the end of the day - just hope the end of this BS is drawing near.

SIlverbee's picture

Turd

Sorry mate I don't see anything about today's action to tell me the EE are not still in charge. If there had been a fundamental change last week it would have continued through to now.

Another point, if COMEX effectively fails and CSF happens where is the next guaranteed place to get spot price discovery? Shanghai exchange? Ned's exchange will not be established enough to do the job.  

Dyna mo hum's picture

Turd

Go have a beer or two on me.

tmosley's picture

ancient money, that is pretty

ancient money, that is pretty much my exact thesis right there, except for the different endgame you propose.

I think that once Silver futures approach zero, private users will drive an industrial panic.  Silver will be bought at any price, and may explode as high as ten ounces of gold per oz of silver or even higher, so that the industries that require minimal amounts of silver, but MUST HAVE IT can keep operating, even if it means doubling or tripling the price of their product (of which the current silver cost is less than a penny).

These prices will be paid, even if it is in a disorderly manner.  That is the part that worries me.  You may find a situation where some people are paying a hundred dollars an ounce, while others are paying a hundred thousand.

The only alternative to that that I can see is the emergence of another silver futures exchange that is totally separate and considered above reproach (not by reputation, but by constant and expensive auditing by any number of outside firms).

Note that I believe that the levels above 10X gold are a blow off top, and won't last long.  Silver may well stay above gold parity for some time so that inventories can be restored, but I think that long term we will enter a regime where silver is priced like palladium or platinum, rather than being 1/50th the price of gold.  This will be driven by industrial consumption, which I think will consume nearly 100% of mined silver for the foreseeable future, at least ten years.  Silver being priced proportionately to the gold/silver ratio in the ground is over.  That only holds true when both gold and silver are hoarded.  Silver has been dishoarded, and has since become rarer than gold.

benque's picture

This may suck today......

BUT; knowing the EE modus operandi, and given the recent moves + seasonals, should we not expect a sharp reversal in Asia tonight, or some time tomorrow?

This type of action, seemingly unrelated to any significant news or events, usually presages something to come, which is PM bullish.

Any ideas?

Syndicate content Comments for "Meandering Monday"